Publication: Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: short dual-pulse sequence versus standard multiparametric MR imaging-a multireader study
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: short dual-pulse sequence versus standard multiparametric MR imaging-a multireader study
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Barth, B. K., De Visschere, P. J. L., Cornelius, A., Nicolau, C., Vargas, H. A., Eberli, D., & Donati, O. F. (2017). Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: short dual-pulse sequence versus standard multiparametric MR imaging-a multireader study. Radiology, 284(3), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162020
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of a short dual-pulse sequence magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol versus a standard six-pulse sequence multiparametric MR imaging protocol for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the regional ethics committee. Between July 2013 and March 2015, 63 patients from a prospectively accrued study population who underwent MR imaging of the prostate including transverse T1-weighted; transverse, coronal, and sagi
Metrics
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Barth, B. K., De Visschere, P. J. L., Cornelius, A., Nicolau, C., Vargas, H. A., Eberli, D., & Donati, O. F. (2017). Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: short dual-pulse sequence versus standard multiparametric MR imaging-a multireader study. Radiology, 284(3), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162020