Publication:

Comparing results of an exact versus an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: A cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values

Date

Date

Date
2014
Journal Article
Published version

Citations

Citation copied

Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Algesheimer, R., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). Comparing results of an exact versus an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: A cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00982

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

One of the most frequently used procedures for measurement invariance testing is the multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA). Muthén and Asparouhov recently proposed a new approach to test for approximate rather than exact measurement invariance using Bayesian MGCFA. Approximate measurement invariance permits small differences between parameters otherwise constrained to be equal in the classical exact approach. However, extant knowledge about how results of approximate measurement invariance tests compare to the results of the

Metrics

Downloads

161 since deposited on 2014-09-10
157last week
Acq. date: 2025-11-14

Views

293 since deposited on 2014-09-10
292last week
Acq. date: 2025-11-14

Additional indexing

Creators (Authors)

Journal/Series Title

Journal/Series Title

Journal/Series Title

Page range/Item number

Page range/Item number

Page range/Item number
5:982

Item Type

Item Type

Item Type
Journal Article

Dewey Decimal Classifikation

Dewey Decimal Classifikation

Dewey Decimal Classifikation

Keywords

multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, exact measurement invariance, approximate measurement invariance, configural metric scalar measurement invariance, Revised Portrait Values Questionnaire, Bayesian analysis

Scope

Scope

Scope
Discipline-based scholarship (basic research)

Language

Language

Language
English

Publication date

Publication date

Publication date
2014

Date available

Date available

Date available
2014-09-10

Publisher

Publisher

Publisher

ISSN or e-ISSN

ISSN or e-ISSN

ISSN or e-ISSN
1664-1078

OA Status

OA Status

OA Status
Gold

Free Access at

Free Access at

Free Access at
DOI

Other Identification Number

Other Identification Number

Other Identification Number
merlin-id:10074

Metrics

Downloads

161 since deposited on 2014-09-10
157last week
Acq. date: 2025-11-14

Views

293 since deposited on 2014-09-10
292last week
Acq. date: 2025-11-14

Citations

Citation copied

Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Algesheimer, R., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). Comparing results of an exact versus an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: A cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values. Frontiers in Psychology, 5:982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00982

Gold Open Access
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

Files

Files
Files available to download:1

Files

Files

Files
Files available to download:1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image