Publication: The inconsistent reduction: an internal methodological critique of revisionist just war theory
The inconsistent reduction: an internal methodological critique of revisionist just war theory
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Surber, R. S. (2024). The inconsistent reduction: an internal methodological critique of revisionist just war theory. Philosophia, 52(2), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-024-00733-5
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
This article argues that the reduction of the morality of killing in war to the morality of killing in self-defense by ‘reductive-individualist’ revisionist just war theories is inconsistent, because when those theories apply the moral notion of self-defense to the morality of killing in war, they do not preserve the two conceptions of the “individual” inherent in this notion. The article demonstrates this inconsistency in two steps: First, it disentangles the two conceptions of the individual inherent to the notion of self-defense, n
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Keywords
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Citations
Surber, R. S. (2024). The inconsistent reduction: an internal methodological critique of revisionist just war theory. Philosophia, 52(2), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-024-00733-5