Publication: The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis
The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Mantica, G., Balzarini, F., Chierigo, F., Keller, E. X., Talso, M., Emiliani, E., Pietropaolo, A., Papalia, R., Scarpa, R. M., Terrone, C., & Esperto, F. (2022). The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urology and Nephrology, 74(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04587-0
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an updated comparison between the currently available minimally invasive approaches (PCNL, laparoscopic [LP] and robotic pyelolithotomy [RP]) for the management of large renal stones.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
An electronic search of the current literature was conducted through the Medline and NCBI PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials databases in March 2021. Studies about minimally-invasive treatme
Metrics
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Views
Citations
Mantica, G., Balzarini, F., Chierigo, F., Keller, E. X., Talso, M., Emiliani, E., Pietropaolo, A., Papalia, R., Scarpa, R. M., Terrone, C., & Esperto, F. (2022). The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urology and Nephrology, 74(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04587-0