Publication: Are dislocated direct objects clause-external? Evidence from differential object marking
Are dislocated direct objects clause-external? Evidence from differential object marking
Date
Date
Date
2014
Book Section
Published version
Citations
Iemmolo, G. (2014). Are dislocated direct objects clause-external? Evidence from differential object marking. In K. Carpenter, O. David, & F. Lionnet (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (No. 38; Issue 38, pp. 190–205). Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Editors
Title of Book
Title of Book
Title of Book
Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Place of Publication
Berkeley
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
190
Page end
Page end
Page end
205
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Book Section
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
English
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
2014
Date available
Date available
Date available
2014-11-20
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Closed
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Unspecified
Citations
Iemmolo, G. (2014). Are dislocated direct objects clause-external? Evidence from differential object marking. In K. Carpenter, O. David, & F. Lionnet (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (No. 38; Issue 38, pp. 190–205). Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Closed
Loading...
Permanent URL
Files
Files
Files
Files available to download:1
Files
Files
Files
Files available to download:1
Loading...