Publication: Justice and procedure: how does "accountability for reasonableness" result in fair limit-setting decisions?
Justice and procedure: how does "accountability for reasonableness" result in fair limit-setting decisions?
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Rid (Schulz-Baldes), A. (2009). Justice and procedure: how does “accountability for reasonableness” result in fair limit-setting decisions? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.024430
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Norman Daniels’ theory of justice and health faces a serious practical problem: his theory can ground the special moral importance of health and allows distinguishing just from unjust health inequalities, but it provides little practical guidance for allocating resources when they are especially scarce. Daniels’ solution to this problem is a fair process that he specifies as “accountability for reasonableness”. Daniels claims that accountability for reasonableness makes limit-setting decisions in healthcare not only legitimate, but al
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Rid (Schulz-Baldes), A. (2009). Justice and procedure: how does “accountability for reasonableness” result in fair limit-setting decisions? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.024430
