Publication: Evaluation of Glass-Ionomer versus Bulk-Fill Resin Composite: A Two-Year Randomized Clinical Study
Evaluation of Glass-Ionomer versus Bulk-Fill Resin Composite: A Two-Year Randomized Clinical Study
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Uzel, İ., Aykut-Yetkiner, A., Ersin, N., Ertuğrul, F., Atila, E., & Özcan, M. (2022). Evaluation of Glass-Ionomer versus Bulk-Fill Resin Composite: A Two-Year Randomized Clinical Study. Materials, 15(20), 7271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207271
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The aim of this split-mouth design research was to compare the clinical performance of a glass-ionomer cement system on Class I/II cavities against the clinical performance of bulk-fill resin composite restoration materials.
METHODS
Thirty-five patients were randomized and enrolled in the study, aged between 10 and 12 years, all of whom had a matched pair of permanent mandibular carious molars with similar Class I/II. A total of 70 restoration placements were performed. The patients were each given two restorations consi
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Number
Number
Number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
In collections
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Free Access at
Free Access at
Free Access at
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Uzel, İ., Aykut-Yetkiner, A., Ersin, N., Ertuğrul, F., Atila, E., & Özcan, M. (2022). Evaluation of Glass-Ionomer versus Bulk-Fill Resin Composite: A Two-Year Randomized Clinical Study. Materials, 15(20), 7271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207271