Publication:

Trauma systems: a global comparison

Date

Date

Date
2025
Journal Article
Published version
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-21T11:11:14Z
dc.date.available2025-05-21T11:11:14Z
dc.date.issued2025-05
dc.description.abstract

Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, with 40 million people permanently injured and nearly 6 million deaths every year. Approximately 90% of trauma-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, and 50% of trauma-related deaths are believed to be preventable. Although effective trauma systems encompassing prehospital, hospital, and rehabilitative care are critical for improving outcomes, global documentation remains limited. This study provides a comparative analysis of trauma care systems across 8 countries-the United States, Canada, Brazil, Belgium, the Netherlands, Australia, Japan, and South Africa-spanning 5 continents. Each country's analysis includes demographic context, system organization (including prehospital, hospital, and posthospital care), clinical and systemic outcomes, and future directions. Trauma systems across countries vary significantly in the structure and regulation of trauma care, injury patterns, national data collection, and accessibility, reflecting diverse demographics and healthcare infrastructures. National trauma registries are well established in countries like the Netherlands, Japan, and Canada but are in early development stages in Brazil, South Africa, and Belgium. In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Canada, trauma from traffic collisions and falls dominates, whereas others, such as Brazil and South Africa, have higher rates of violence-related injuries like homicides. Accessibility in remote areas remains a challenge in countries with large landmasses such as Canada and Australia, where rural populations often face limited or delayed trauma care. Other countries, such as the United States and South Africa, face different challenges linked to disparities in quality of and access to care between public and private systems. Although centralization of trauma care, standardization of national trauma care systems, and investment in workforce and infrastructure are universal goals for improving outcomes, solutions tailored to each country are required to optimize trauma systems globally.

dc.identifier.doi10.1097/OI9.0000000000000376
dc.identifier.issn2574-2167
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/230806
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subject.ddc610 Medicine & health
dc.title

Trauma systems: a global comparison

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleOTA International
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number3S
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameWolters Kluwer
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestarte376
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid40321463
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume8
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.authorMiclau, Theodore
uzh.contributor.authorBalogh, Zsolt J
uzh.contributor.authorMiclau, Katherine R
uzh.contributor.authorBernstein, Brian
uzh.contributor.authorKojima, Kodi Edson
uzh.contributor.authorKurozumi, Taketo
uzh.contributor.authorLeighton, Ross K
uzh.contributor.authorLundy, Douglas W
uzh.contributor.authorPutzeys, Guy
uzh.contributor.authorSchipper, Inger B
uzh.contributor.authorVandesande, Wim
uzh.contributor.authorde Camargo Leonhardt, Marcos
uzh.contributor.authorMiranda Goncalves, Maria Adelaide
uzh.contributor.authorPelosini Gaiarsa, Guilherme
uzh.contributor.authorPape, Hans-Christoph
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.contributor.correspondenceNo
uzh.document.availabilitypublished_version
uzh.eprint.datestamp2025-05-21 11:11:14
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-05-21 11:11:36
uzh.eprint.statusChange2025-05-21 11:11:14
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-277796
uzh.jdb.eprintsId45078
uzh.oastatus.zoraGold
uzh.publication.citationMiclau, Theodore; Balogh, Zsolt J; Miclau, Katherine R; Bernstein, Brian; Kojima, Kodi Edson; Kurozumi, Taketo; Leighton, Ross K; Lundy, Douglas W; Putzeys, Guy; Schipper, Inger B; Vandesande, Wim; de Camargo Leonhardt, Marcos; Miranda Goncalves, Maria Adelaide; Pelosini Gaiarsa, Guilherme; Pape, Hans-Christoph (2025). Trauma systems: a global comparison. OTA International, 8(3S):e376.
uzh.publication.freeAccessAtdoi
uzh.publication.originalworkoriginal
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.workflow.doajuzh.workflow.doaj.true
uzh.workflow.eprintid277796
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatuspublic
uzh.workflow.revisions13
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.sourcePubMed:PMID:40321463
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
Files

Original bundle

Name:
2025_Miclau_OTA_Int_Trauma_systems_a_global_comparison.pdf
Size:
162.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Publication available in collections: