Publication: Is Rehearsal an Effective Maintenance Strategy for Working Memory?
Is Rehearsal an Effective Maintenance Strategy for Working Memory?
Date
Date
Date
| cris.lastimport.scopus | 2025-05-29T05:46:56Z | |
| cris.lastimport.wos | 2025-07-20T01:34:13Z | |
| cris.virtual.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3902-7318 | |
| cris.virtualsource.orcid | 477ba472-daa3-459e-bcf4-f9471ef127d9 | |
| dc.contributor.institution | University of Zurich | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-21T09:49:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-21T09:49:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-09-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A common assumption in theories of working memory is that a maintenance process – broadly referred to as rehearsal – is involved in keeping novel information available. This review evaluates the effectiveness of three forms of rehearsal: articulatory rehearsal, attention-based refreshing, and elaborative rehearsal. Evidence for the effectiveness of these strategies is surprisingly weak. Experimental manipulations of articulatory rehearsal have yielded working memory benefits in children, but not in adults; experimentally induced refreshing prioritizes the refreshed information, but yields little benefit compared to a baseline without induced refreshing; and elaborative rehearsal improves episodic long-term memory but has little effect on working memory. Thus, although adults spontaneously use some of these strategies, rehearsal might not play a causal role in keeping information in working memory. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.002 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1364-6613 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85068528020 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/159162 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 000480652500011 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.subject | Experimental and Cognitive Psychology | |
| dc.subject | Cognitive Neuroscience | |
| dc.subject | Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 150 Psychology | |
| dc.title | Is Rehearsal an Effective Maintenance Strategy for Working Memory? | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dcterms.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle | Trends in Cognitive Sciences | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number | 9 | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername | Elsevier | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend | 809 | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart | 798 | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid | 31301953 | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume | 23 | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | en |
| uzh.contributor.affiliation | University of Zurich | |
| uzh.contributor.author | Oberauer, Klaus | |
| uzh.contributor.correspondence | Yes | |
| uzh.document.availability | postprint | |
| uzh.eprint.datestamp | 2019-08-21 09:49:08 | |
| uzh.eprint.lastmod | 2025-07-20 01:40:31 | |
| uzh.eprint.statusChange | 2019-08-21 09:49:08 | |
| uzh.harvester.eth | Yes | |
| uzh.harvester.nb | No | |
| uzh.identifier.doi | 10.5167/uzh-173131 | |
| uzh.jdb.eprintsId | 17249 | |
| uzh.oastatus.unpaywall | green | |
| uzh.oastatus.zora | Green | |
| uzh.publication.citation | Oberauer, Klaus (2019). Is Rehearsal an Effective Maintenance Strategy for Working Memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(9):798-809. | |
| uzh.publication.originalwork | further | |
| uzh.publication.publishedStatus | final | |
| uzh.scopus.impact | 60 | |
| uzh.scopus.subjects | Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology | |
| uzh.scopus.subjects | Experimental and Cognitive Psychology | |
| uzh.scopus.subjects | Cognitive Neuroscience | |
| uzh.workflow.eprintid | 173131 | |
| uzh.workflow.fulltextStatus | public | |
| uzh.workflow.revisions | 55 | |
| uzh.workflow.rightsCheck | keininfo | |
| uzh.workflow.source | CrossRef:10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.002 | |
| uzh.workflow.status | archive | |
| uzh.wos.impact | 52 | |
| Files | ||
| Publication available in collections: |