Publication:

Is Rehearsal an Effective Maintenance Strategy for Working Memory?

Date

Date

Date
2019
Journal Article
Published version
cris.lastimport.scopus2025-05-29T05:46:56Z
cris.lastimport.wos2025-07-20T01:34:13Z
cris.virtual.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3902-7318
cris.virtualsource.orcid477ba472-daa3-459e-bcf4-f9471ef127d9
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-21T09:49:08Z
dc.date.available2019-08-21T09:49:08Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01
dc.description.abstract

A common assumption in theories of working memory is that a maintenance process – broadly referred to as rehearsal – is involved in keeping novel information available. This review evaluates the effectiveness of three forms of rehearsal: articulatory rehearsal, attention-based refreshing, and elaborative rehearsal. Evidence for the effectiveness of these strategies is surprisingly weak. Experimental manipulations of articulatory rehearsal have yielded working memory benefits in children, but not in adults; experimentally induced refreshing prioritizes the refreshed information, but yields little benefit compared to a baseline without induced refreshing; and elaborative rehearsal improves episodic long-term memory but has little effect on working memory. Thus, although adults spontaneously use some of these strategies, rehearsal might not play a causal role in keeping information in working memory.

dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.002
dc.identifier.issn1364-6613
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85068528020
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.zora.uzh.ch/handle/20.500.14742/159162
dc.identifier.wos000480652500011
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
dc.subjectCognitive Neuroscience
dc.subjectNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
dc.subject.ddc150 Psychology
dc.title

Is Rehearsal an Effective Maintenance Strategy for Working Memory?

dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitleTrends in Cognitive Sciences
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number9
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishernameElsevier
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend809
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart798
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid31301953
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume23
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
uzh.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Zurich
uzh.contributor.authorOberauer, Klaus
uzh.contributor.correspondenceYes
uzh.document.availabilitypostprint
uzh.eprint.datestamp2019-08-21 09:49:08
uzh.eprint.lastmod2025-07-20 01:40:31
uzh.eprint.statusChange2019-08-21 09:49:08
uzh.harvester.ethYes
uzh.harvester.nbNo
uzh.identifier.doi10.5167/uzh-173131
uzh.jdb.eprintsId17249
uzh.oastatus.unpaywallgreen
uzh.oastatus.zoraGreen
uzh.publication.citationOberauer, Klaus (2019). Is Rehearsal an Effective Maintenance Strategy for Working Memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(9):798-809.
uzh.publication.originalworkfurther
uzh.publication.publishedStatusfinal
uzh.scopus.impact60
uzh.scopus.subjectsNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
uzh.scopus.subjectsExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
uzh.scopus.subjectsCognitive Neuroscience
uzh.workflow.eprintid173131
uzh.workflow.fulltextStatuspublic
uzh.workflow.revisions55
uzh.workflow.rightsCheckkeininfo
uzh.workflow.sourceCrossRef:10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.002
uzh.workflow.statusarchive
uzh.wos.impact52
Files

Original bundle

Name:
Oberauer.2019.Rehearsal.TiCS.Manuscript.pdf
Size:
574.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Publication available in collections: