Publication: Measuring impartial preference for biodiversity
Measuring impartial preference for biodiversity
Date
Date
Date
Citations
Meinard, Y., Remy, A., & Schmid, B. (2017). Measuring impartial preference for biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 132, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.007
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Biodiversity undergoes unprecedented rates of erosion despite the important services it provides. This is considered evidence that biodiversity is undervalued. Biodiversity valuation is accordingly a prominent issue in the literature. Economic valuations are, however, largely criticized. Numerous alternatives have been introduced. Most of them involve participatory protocols aimed at producing high-quality results. Being time-consuming and expensive, it is difficult to implement and reproduce them at a large scale. We produce an easil
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Additional indexing
Creators (Authors)
Volume
Volume
Volume
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page range/Item number
Page end
Page end
Page end
Item Type
Item Type
Item Type
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Dewey Decimal Classifikation
Language
Language
Language
Publication date
Publication date
Publication date
Date available
Date available
Date available
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
ISSN or e-ISSN
OA Status
OA Status
OA Status
Publisher DOI
Metrics
Downloads
Views
Citations
Meinard, Y., Remy, A., & Schmid, B. (2017). Measuring impartial preference for biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 132, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.007