Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Differences in medication adherence between living and deceased donor kidney transplant patients


Denhaerynck, K; Schmid-Mohler, G; Kiss, A; Steiger, J; Wüthrich, R P; Bock, A; De Geest, S (2014). Differences in medication adherence between living and deceased donor kidney transplant patients. International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine, 5(1):7-14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Literature review suggests that adherence to immunosuppressive drugs may be lower in recipients of living than of deceased donor kidney grafts, possibly because of profile differences.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the level of immunosuppressive adherence levels between patients with deceased and living (-related; -unrelated) donor grafts in Switzerland.
METHODS: Using data from two similar cross-sectional studies at two transplant centers in Switzerland, the level of adherence between the two groups was compared. Medication adherence was assessed by self-report or electronic monitoring. Possible explanatory factors included age, beliefs regarding immunosuppressive drugs, depressive symptomatology, pre-emptive transplantation, and the number of transplants received, were also considered. Data were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Unadjusted non-adherence odds were 2 to 3 times higher in living-related than deceased donor transplantation (ORs: 2.09-3.05; p<0.05). Adjustment for confounders showed that these differences were associated most with the younger age of living-related subjects and the belief that immunosuppressive drugs are less important for living-related donations.
CONCLUSION: There is a lower immunosuppressive adherence in recipients of living-related donor kidneys, possibly owing to differences in patient profile (ie, health beliefs regarding their immunosuppressive needs), knowledge of which may enhance adherence if addressed.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Literature review suggests that adherence to immunosuppressive drugs may be lower in recipients of living than of deceased donor kidney grafts, possibly because of profile differences.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the level of immunosuppressive adherence levels between patients with deceased and living (-related; -unrelated) donor grafts in Switzerland.
METHODS: Using data from two similar cross-sectional studies at two transplant centers in Switzerland, the level of adherence between the two groups was compared. Medication adherence was assessed by self-report or electronic monitoring. Possible explanatory factors included age, beliefs regarding immunosuppressive drugs, depressive symptomatology, pre-emptive transplantation, and the number of transplants received, were also considered. Data were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Unadjusted non-adherence odds were 2 to 3 times higher in living-related than deceased donor transplantation (ORs: 2.09-3.05; p<0.05). Adjustment for confounders showed that these differences were associated most with the younger age of living-related subjects and the belief that immunosuppressive drugs are less important for living-related donations.
CONCLUSION: There is a lower immunosuppressive adherence in recipients of living-related donor kidneys, possibly owing to differences in patient profile (ie, health beliefs regarding their immunosuppressive needs), knowledge of which may enhance adherence if addressed.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Downloads

32 downloads since deposited on 04 Feb 2015
3 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, not_refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Nephrology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Transplantation
Language:English
Date:2014
Deposited On:04 Feb 2015 11:57
Last Modified:30 Jul 2020 16:16
Publisher:Avicenna Organ Transplantation Institute
ISSN:2008-6482
OA Status:Gold
Free access at:PubMed ID. An embargo period may apply.
Official URL:http://www.ijotm.com/ojs/index.php/IJOTM/article/view/166
PubMed ID:25013673
  • Content: Published Version