Abstract
To be informed about political news and policy making processes is a sine qua non in representative democracies. Moreover the media’s role in pointing out who is to be held accountable, who is responsible for policy decisions and to whom policy competence can be attributed is maybe the cardinal function of the media to society (cf. Gurevitch and Blumler 1990). Through the media, policy actors become accountable to the wider public – the electorate – not only in elections, but in the news media. In this respect it is argued that independent media and political communication are a resource of democratic legitimacy for policy makers and their actions. By being a forum and an actor the media provide public accountability to society and thereby through communication contribute to the democratic legitimacy of the political system. But how do the media portray political responsibility and accountability in public communication? What are the influences and determinants of accountability in public? Are complex governance networks a hindrance to the clarity of responsibility?
Today’s policy making processes are intertwined and multilayered, whether on an international or on a domestic level. Denationalisation processes (Zürn 2000) together with the forces of globalization, create political spaces that ignore traditional boundaries. Metropolitan areas are an example of such new political spaces that have evolved over the last decades. They are typical multilevel frameworks where citizens are subject to decisions by different political actors from different political orders. An increase of scientific interest in metropolitan governance structures (Sellers 2005; Kübler 2012) discusses specifically the question of accountability, since decisions in metropolitan multilevel structures are not always made by an institutionalised government, but more often by loose governance networks (Kübler and Schwab 2007; Goetz et al. 2002). This is due to the fact, that more and more policy fields, for instance transport planning or economic promotion, do not affect individual municipalities only, but whole regions, usually around big cities. As a consequence, metropolitan areas can either build up new institutions that are not restricted to one municipality but govern the whole region; or all affected municipalities have to coordinate their interests, maybe even together with private actors such as transport companies, to solve regional policy problems. In the latter case, it is argued that citizens might not understand who is responsible for policy changes, and do not have any chance to sanction actors who do not represent their interests.
That is when the media’s role in pointing out who is to be held accountable and to whom responsibility can be attributed becomes crucial. Moreover, it is particularly in those multilevel governance arrangements where democratic legitimacy is scarce and where public accountability may fill the gap.
Taken together I argue that legitimacy through political communication is constructed and that media and political system characteristics shape the way policy actors are held publicly accountable and the way responsibility is attributed to them. A quantitative comparative investigation across European city regions based on content analysis of metropolitan newspapers will be the framework for the analysis of public accountability.
Hasler, Karin