Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Impact of reassessment of colonic hyperplastic polyps by expert GI pathologists


Schachschal, Guido; Sehner, Susanne; Choschzik, Matthias; Aust, Daniela; Brandl, Lydia; Vieth, Michael; Wegscheider, Karl; Baretton, Gustavo B; Kirchner, Thomas; Sauter, Guido; Rösch, Thomas (2016). Impact of reassessment of colonic hyperplastic polyps by expert GI pathologists. International journal of colorectal disease, 31(3):675-683.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Recommended follow-up intervals after endoscopic removal of hyperplastic polyps (HP) and sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) differ because of assumed differences in biological behaviour. However, histopathologic differentiation is difficult, with higher SSA rates reported from specialist GI histopathologists.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to clarify the relevance of histologic reassessment of HP.

DESIGN AND SETTING:

From a prospective screening colonoscopy study relevant serrated lesions (excluding distal small HP ≤5 mm) diagnosed by private practice pathologists were reassessed by four specialized GI pathologists

PATIENTS:

One thousand sixty-nine screening colonoscopies were performed in patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:

In terms of main outcome measurements, there is a likelihood of changes of the HP diagnosis on reassessment, as well as interrater variability.

RESULTS:

SSA were initially diagnosed in 7 cases (0.7 %) and relevant HP in 83 (7.8 %; 101 lesions). Of the latter, the chance of a change in diagnosis from HP to SSA by any of the four specialist histopathologists was higher for larger (>5 mm) and right-sided lesions (19.1 vs 1.3 %, OR 18.4, p = 0.04) including a higher likelihood to change recommended follow-up intervals (32.1 vs 3.3 %, p < 0.01). However, follow-up intervals were determined by concomitant adenomas in 41 %. Interrater variability was also higher for these lesions (p = 0.04), with an overall kappa value of 0.48. However, this issue related to only 1.2 % of the 1069 study cases.

LIMITATION:

The limitations this study are the limited case number as well as limited retrospective assessment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Right-sided HP >5 mm had a higher chance of change in diagnosis to SSA; therefore, they should probably be treated like adenomas and be removed. However, reliable data for recommendations on follow-up intervals of HP or SSA will require follow-up studies.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Recommended follow-up intervals after endoscopic removal of hyperplastic polyps (HP) and sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) differ because of assumed differences in biological behaviour. However, histopathologic differentiation is difficult, with higher SSA rates reported from specialist GI histopathologists.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to clarify the relevance of histologic reassessment of HP.

DESIGN AND SETTING:

From a prospective screening colonoscopy study relevant serrated lesions (excluding distal small HP ≤5 mm) diagnosed by private practice pathologists were reassessed by four specialized GI pathologists

PATIENTS:

One thousand sixty-nine screening colonoscopies were performed in patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:

In terms of main outcome measurements, there is a likelihood of changes of the HP diagnosis on reassessment, as well as interrater variability.

RESULTS:

SSA were initially diagnosed in 7 cases (0.7 %) and relevant HP in 83 (7.8 %; 101 lesions). Of the latter, the chance of a change in diagnosis from HP to SSA by any of the four specialist histopathologists was higher for larger (>5 mm) and right-sided lesions (19.1 vs 1.3 %, OR 18.4, p = 0.04) including a higher likelihood to change recommended follow-up intervals (32.1 vs 3.3 %, p < 0.01). However, follow-up intervals were determined by concomitant adenomas in 41 %. Interrater variability was also higher for these lesions (p = 0.04), with an overall kappa value of 0.48. However, this issue related to only 1.2 % of the 1069 study cases.

LIMITATION:

The limitations this study are the limited case number as well as limited retrospective assessment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Right-sided HP >5 mm had a higher chance of change in diagnosis to SSA; therefore, they should probably be treated like adenomas and be removed. However, reliable data for recommendations on follow-up intervals of HP or SSA will require follow-up studies.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
4 citations in Web of Science®
5 citations in Scopus®
3 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

40 downloads since deposited on 17 May 2016
24 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:31 March 2016
Deposited On:17 May 2016 08:53
Last Modified:02 Feb 2018 09:59
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0179-1958
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2523-8
PubMed ID:26847619

Download

Download PDF  'Impact of reassessment of colonic hyperplastic polyps by expert GI pathologists'.
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 4MB
View at publisher