Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms


Maggetti, Martino; Gilardi, Fabrizio (2016). Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy, 36(1):87-107.

Abstract

A growing literature in public policy, comparative politics and international relations has studied how the policies of one unit (e.g. country, federal state or city) are influenced by the policies of other units – that is, how policies diffuse. This article provides a meta-analysis of 114 studies, demonstrating persisting inconsistencies in the measurement of the mechanisms driving policy diffusion processes. Different indicators are used to measure the same mechanism, and the same indicators are used to measure different mechanisms. To improve this state of affairs, this article puts forward a conceptual structure that serves as a guide for the application of diffusion arguments, a starting point for theoretical refinement and a benchmark to assess measurement validity. In addition to paying more attention to the conceptual consistency of indicators, overcoming the problems currently found in the literature requires the construction of original, innovative research designs instead of the replication of widely used templates.

Abstract

A growing literature in public policy, comparative politics and international relations has studied how the policies of one unit (e.g. country, federal state or city) are influenced by the policies of other units – that is, how policies diffuse. This article provides a meta-analysis of 114 studies, demonstrating persisting inconsistencies in the measurement of the mechanisms driving policy diffusion processes. Different indicators are used to measure the same mechanism, and the same indicators are used to measure different mechanisms. To improve this state of affairs, this article puts forward a conceptual structure that serves as a guide for the application of diffusion arguments, a starting point for theoretical refinement and a benchmark to assess measurement validity. In addition to paying more attention to the conceptual consistency of indicators, overcoming the problems currently found in the literature requires the construction of original, innovative research designs instead of the replication of widely used templates.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
21 citations in Web of Science®
30 citations in Scopus®
75 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:320 Political science
Uncontrolled Keywords:meta-analysis, policy diffusion, policy learning, QCA
Language:English
Date:March 2016
Deposited On:02 Dec 2016 07:02
Last Modified:23 Sep 2018 06:02
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:1469-7815
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X1400035X
Official URL:https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9C06B9C4D37591FC641694FEC07DE5CF/S0143814X1400035Xa.pdf/problems-and-solutions-in-the-measurement-of-policy-diffusion-mechanisms.pdf
Related URLs:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-public-policy/article/problems-and-solutions-in-the-measurement-of-policy-diffusion-mechanisms/9C06B9C4D37591FC641694FEC07DE5CF

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

Get full-text in a library