Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal

Gartenmann, Stefanie J; Thurnheer, Thomas; Attin, Thomas; Schmidlin, Patrick R (2017). Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal. Clinical Oral Investigations, 21(4):1029-1036.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the effects of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on the removal of a multispecies biofilm under standardized conditions in vitro. METHODS Six-species biofilms were grown on hydroxyapatite discs for 64 h and treated with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic tip (Cavitron) placed either on contact or at 0.25- and 0.5-mm distance. The treatment was performed for 15 s with either the tip at right angle or sideways. Biofilm removal was evaluated by assessing the viable bacteria in each supernatant and compared to respective controls. In the latter, biofilms were mechanically removed and evaluated in supernatants to assess adhering and floating bacteria. Colony-forming units (CFU) were determined by cultivation on solid media. Any remaining biofilm on the treated discs was also visualized after staining with green-fluorescent SYTO® 9 stain using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Mann-Whitney U tests and Bonferroni correction were used to analyze the results between the groups. RESULTS Sideways application of the ultrasonic tip at distances of 0.25 and 0.5 mm removed as many bacteria as present on the control discs compared to the tip on contact (p < 0.05). All other application modes, especially the ultrasonic tip applied perpendicularly on contact, showed no statistical significance in removing biofilm. CONCLUSION Overall, data indicated that bacterial detachment depended on tip orientation and distance, especially when the tip was applied sideways similar to the clinical setting. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Biofilm removal by means of ultrasonic debridement remains a crucial aspect in the treatment of periodontal disease. To ensure sufficient biofilm removal, the tip does not necessarily require contact to the surface, but an application parallel to the surface on the side is recommended.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry
04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Institute of Oral Biology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > General Dentistry
Language:English
Date:2017
Deposited On:03 Jan 2017 16:45
Last Modified:15 Nov 2024 04:36
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:1432-6981
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1854-8
PubMed ID:27193939

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
8 citations in Web of Science®
12 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

426 downloads since deposited on 03 Jan 2017
47 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications