Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Automatic affective-motivational regulation processes underlying supportive dyadic coping: the role of increased implicit positive attitudes toward communal goals in response to a stressed relationship partner


Koranyi, Nicolas; Hilpert, Peter; Job, Veronika; Bodenmann, Guy (2017). Automatic affective-motivational regulation processes underlying supportive dyadic coping: the role of increased implicit positive attitudes toward communal goals in response to a stressed relationship partner. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 30(5):521-535.

Abstract

Background and objectives:
We examined the implicit affective mechanisms underlying provision of support in intimate dyads. Specifically, we hypothesized that in individuals with high relationship satisfaction, the perception that one’s partner is stressed leads to increased implicit positive attitudes toward communal goals. In turn, this change in implicit attitudes facilitates supportive behavior.

Design and methods:
In two studies, we induced partner stress by instructing participants to either recall a situation where their partner was highly stressed (Study 1; N=47 university students) or imagine a specific stressful event (excessive workload; Study 2; N=85 university students). Subsequently, implicit attitudes toward communal goals were assessed with an Implicit Association Test.

Results:
In both studies, we found that among participants with high relationship satisfaction partner stress increases preferences for communal goals. In addition, implicit preferences for communal goals predicted stronger inclinations to engage in supportive dyadic coping (Study 2).

Conclusions:
The current findings provide important insights into the implicit cognitive-affective mechanics of dyadic coping. Moreover, they can explain how people manage to avoid experiencing motivational conflicts between partner-oriented and self-oriented goals in situations characterized by high partner stress.

Abstract

Background and objectives:
We examined the implicit affective mechanisms underlying provision of support in intimate dyads. Specifically, we hypothesized that in individuals with high relationship satisfaction, the perception that one’s partner is stressed leads to increased implicit positive attitudes toward communal goals. In turn, this change in implicit attitudes facilitates supportive behavior.

Design and methods:
In two studies, we induced partner stress by instructing participants to either recall a situation where their partner was highly stressed (Study 1; N=47 university students) or imagine a specific stressful event (excessive workload; Study 2; N=85 university students). Subsequently, implicit attitudes toward communal goals were assessed with an Implicit Association Test.

Results:
In both studies, we found that among participants with high relationship satisfaction partner stress increases preferences for communal goals. In addition, implicit preferences for communal goals predicted stronger inclinations to engage in supportive dyadic coping (Study 2).

Conclusions:
The current findings provide important insights into the implicit cognitive-affective mechanics of dyadic coping. Moreover, they can explain how people manage to avoid experiencing motivational conflicts between partner-oriented and self-oriented goals in situations characterized by high partner stress.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
3 citations in Web of Science®
2 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > Developmental and Educational Psychology
Social Sciences & Humanities > Clinical Psychology
Social Sciences & Humanities > Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Health Sciences > Psychiatry and Mental Health
Language:English
Date:2017
Deposited On:01 Mar 2017 13:07
Last Modified:26 Jan 2022 12:36
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:1061-5806
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2017.1292421
PubMed ID:28276707
Full text not available from this repository.