Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Pillars of judgment: how memory abilities affect performance in rule-based and exemplar-based judgments


Hoffmann, Janina A; von Helversen, Bettina; Rieskamp, Jörg (2014). Pillars of judgment: how memory abilities affect performance in rule-based and exemplar-based judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6):2242-2261.

Abstract

Making accurate judgments is an essential skill in everyday life. Although how different memory abilities relate to categorization and judgment processes has been hotly debated, the question is far from resolved. We contribute to the solution by investigating how individual differences in memory abilities affect judgment performance in 2 tasks that induced rule-based or exemplar-based judgment strategies. In a study with 279 participants, we investigated how working memory and episodic memory affect judgment accuracy and strategy use. As predicted, participants switched strategies between tasks. Furthermore, structural equation modeling showed that the ability to solve rule-based tasks was predicted by working memory, whereas episodic memory predicted judgment accuracy in the exemplar-based task. Last, the probability of choosing an exemplar-based strategy was related to better episodic memory, but strategy selection was unrelated to working memory capacity. In sum, our results suggest that different memory abilities are essential for successfully adopting different judgment strategies.

Abstract

Making accurate judgments is an essential skill in everyday life. Although how different memory abilities relate to categorization and judgment processes has been hotly debated, the question is far from resolved. We contribute to the solution by investigating how individual differences in memory abilities affect judgment performance in 2 tasks that induced rule-based or exemplar-based judgment strategies. In a study with 279 participants, we investigated how working memory and episodic memory affect judgment accuracy and strategy use. As predicted, participants switched strategies between tasks. Furthermore, structural equation modeling showed that the ability to solve rule-based tasks was predicted by working memory, whereas episodic memory predicted judgment accuracy in the exemplar-based task. Last, the probability of choosing an exemplar-based strategy was related to better episodic memory, but strategy selection was unrelated to working memory capacity. In sum, our results suggest that different memory abilities are essential for successfully adopting different judgment strategies.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
15 citations in Web of Science®
16 citations in Scopus®
15 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

4 downloads since deposited on 03 Mar 2017
4 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Language:English
Date:December 2014
Deposited On:03 Mar 2017 10:07
Last Modified:13 Jun 2018 13:55
Publisher:American Psychological Association
ISSN:0096-3445
Additional Information:This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037989
PubMed ID:25285427

Download

Download PDF  'Pillars of judgment: how memory abilities affect performance in rule-based and exemplar-based judgments'.
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 863kB
View at publisher