Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Irrational Beliefs and Psychological Distress: A Meta-Analysis


Vîslă, Andreea; Flückiger, Christoph; Grosse Holtforth, Martin; David, Daniel (2016). Irrational Beliefs and Psychological Distress: A Meta-Analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85(1):8-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the cognitive revolution of the early 1950s, cognitions have been discussed as central components in the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses. Even though there is an extensive literature on the association between therapy-related cognitions such as irrational beliefs and psychological distress over the past 60 years, there is little meta-analytical knowledge about the nature of this association.

METHODS: The relationship between irrational beliefs and distress was examined based on a systematic review that included 100 independent samples, gathered in 83 primary studies, using a random-effect model. The overall effects as well as potential moderators were examined: (a) distress measure, (b) irrational belief measure, (c) irrational belief type, (d) method of assessment of distress, (e) nature of irrational beliefs, (f) time lag between irrational beliefs and distress assessment, (g) nature of stressful events, (h) sample characteristics (i.e. age, gender, income, and educational, marital, occupational and clinical status), (i) developer/validator status of the author(s), and (k) publication year and country.

RESULTS: Overall, irrational beliefs were positively associated with various types of distress, such as general distress, anxiety, depression, anger, and guilt (omnibus: r = 0.38). The following variables were significant moderators of the relationship between the intensity of irrational beliefs and the level of distress: irrational belief measure and type, stressful event, age, educational and clinical status, and developer/validator status of the author.

CONCLUSIONS: Irrational beliefs and distress are moderately connected to each other; this relationship remains significant even after controlling for several potential covariates

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the cognitive revolution of the early 1950s, cognitions have been discussed as central components in the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses. Even though there is an extensive literature on the association between therapy-related cognitions such as irrational beliefs and psychological distress over the past 60 years, there is little meta-analytical knowledge about the nature of this association.

METHODS: The relationship between irrational beliefs and distress was examined based on a systematic review that included 100 independent samples, gathered in 83 primary studies, using a random-effect model. The overall effects as well as potential moderators were examined: (a) distress measure, (b) irrational belief measure, (c) irrational belief type, (d) method of assessment of distress, (e) nature of irrational beliefs, (f) time lag between irrational beliefs and distress assessment, (g) nature of stressful events, (h) sample characteristics (i.e. age, gender, income, and educational, marital, occupational and clinical status), (i) developer/validator status of the author(s), and (k) publication year and country.

RESULTS: Overall, irrational beliefs were positively associated with various types of distress, such as general distress, anxiety, depression, anger, and guilt (omnibus: r = 0.38). The following variables were significant moderators of the relationship between the intensity of irrational beliefs and the level of distress: irrational belief measure and type, stressful event, age, educational and clinical status, and developer/validator status of the author.

CONCLUSIONS: Irrational beliefs and distress are moderately connected to each other; this relationship remains significant even after controlling for several potential covariates

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
117 citations in Web of Science®
126 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

733 downloads since deposited on 06 Mar 2017
110 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > Clinical Psychology
Social Sciences & Humanities > Applied Psychology
Health Sciences > Psychiatry and Mental Health
Language:English
Date:2016
Deposited On:06 Mar 2017 12:13
Last Modified:26 Jan 2022 12:37
Publisher:Karger
ISSN:0033-3190
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1159/000441231
PubMed ID:26609889
  • Content: Published Version