Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: A two-steps comparative examination


Bernardi, Luca; Morales, Laura; Lhiste, Maarja; Bischof, Daniel (2018). The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: A two-steps comparative examination. Environmental Politics, 27(1):42-68.

Abstract

Under what conditions do critical events trigger large-scale public discussion and mobilisation, and can these lead to policy change? In a comparative study of nuclear energy policy after the Japanese Fukushima disaster in March 2011, a theory-development approach is adopted, mobilising data collected from national news agencies’ newswires, public surveys, legislation and parliamentary databases, and newspaper editorials in 12 established democracies between March 2011 and March 2013. The analysis suggests two main hypotheses that can guide future research: critical events are more likely to trigger policy change when intense (contentious) mobilisation from policy challengers aligns with the views of the general public, and is backed by major political allies; and critical events are more likely to trigger intense (contentious) mobilisation when policy challengers articulate their opposition around pre-existing policy debates on the issue and resort to pre-existing organisational and mobilisation resources.

Abstract

Under what conditions do critical events trigger large-scale public discussion and mobilisation, and can these lead to policy change? In a comparative study of nuclear energy policy after the Japanese Fukushima disaster in March 2011, a theory-development approach is adopted, mobilising data collected from national news agencies’ newswires, public surveys, legislation and parliamentary databases, and newspaper editorials in 12 established democracies between March 2011 and March 2013. The analysis suggests two main hypotheses that can guide future research: critical events are more likely to trigger policy change when intense (contentious) mobilisation from policy challengers aligns with the views of the general public, and is backed by major political allies; and critical events are more likely to trigger intense (contentious) mobilisation when policy challengers articulate their opposition around pre-existing policy debates on the issue and resort to pre-existing organisational and mobilisation resources.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, not_refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:320 Political science
Language:English
Date:2018
Deposited On:25 Aug 2017 13:29
Last Modified:19 Aug 2018 10:01
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0964-4016
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1383007
Project Information:
  • : FunderFP7
  • : Grant ID284277
  • : Project TitleRESPONSIVEGOV - Democratic Responsiveness in Comparative Perspective: How Do Democratic Governments Respond to Different Expressions of Public Opinion?

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

Get full-text in a library