Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Impact of plaque Ttpe and side branch geometry on side branch compromise after provisional stent implantation a simulation study


Iannaccone, Francesco; Chiastra, Claudio; Karanasos, Antonios; Migliavacca, Francesco; Gijsen, Frank J H; Segers, Patrick; Mortier, Peter; Verhegghe, Benedict; Dubini, Gabriele; De Beule, Matthieu; Regar, Evelyn; Wentzel, Jolanda J (2017). Impact of plaque Ttpe and side branch geometry on side branch compromise after provisional stent implantation a simulation study. EuroIntervention, 13(2):e236-e245.

Abstract

AIMS: Mechanisms of lumen compromise after provisional side branch (SB) stenting are poorly understood. In this study we aimed to investigate the impact of bifurcation angle, plaque composition, and procedural strategy on SB compromise.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Computer simulations of stent implantation were performed in Medina (1,1,1) bifurcation models. Provisional SB stenting was replicated including post-dilation after main branch stenting. Two bifurcation angles (45°, 70°) and four plaque types (fully lipid, fully fibrous, lipid with half and fully calcified ring distal to the carina) were tested. Two post-dilation balloons of different lengths (15 mm and 9 mm) were also investigated. Provisional stenting caused an ovalisation of the SB ostium (i.e., increase of ellipticity from 0.27 to 0.58±0.21, p<0.05) that might appear as a significant stenosis on two-dimensional angiography, although SB ostium area was preserved (-3.3±10.3%) in the absence of calcifications. However, in the presence of calcifications, SB lumen volume compromise was evident (-0.89±0.15 mm3). Plaque type had a higher impact than bifurcation angle on SB ostium shape. A shorter balloon (9 mm) for proximal optimisation reduced SB lumen volume compromise from -1.11 mm3 to -0.72 mm3.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulations showed ovalisation of the SB ostium, generally without significant lumen compromise. Provisional stenting in the presence of calcifications resulted in a more severe outcome for the SB ostium.

Abstract

AIMS: Mechanisms of lumen compromise after provisional side branch (SB) stenting are poorly understood. In this study we aimed to investigate the impact of bifurcation angle, plaque composition, and procedural strategy on SB compromise.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Computer simulations of stent implantation were performed in Medina (1,1,1) bifurcation models. Provisional SB stenting was replicated including post-dilation after main branch stenting. Two bifurcation angles (45°, 70°) and four plaque types (fully lipid, fully fibrous, lipid with half and fully calcified ring distal to the carina) were tested. Two post-dilation balloons of different lengths (15 mm and 9 mm) were also investigated. Provisional stenting caused an ovalisation of the SB ostium (i.e., increase of ellipticity from 0.27 to 0.58±0.21, p<0.05) that might appear as a significant stenosis on two-dimensional angiography, although SB ostium area was preserved (-3.3±10.3%) in the absence of calcifications. However, in the presence of calcifications, SB lumen volume compromise was evident (-0.89±0.15 mm3). Plaque type had a higher impact than bifurcation angle on SB ostium shape. A shorter balloon (9 mm) for proximal optimisation reduced SB lumen volume compromise from -1.11 mm3 to -0.72 mm3.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulations showed ovalisation of the SB ostium, generally without significant lumen compromise. Provisional stenting in the presence of calcifications resulted in a more severe outcome for the SB ostium.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
2 citations in Web of Science®
4 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 27 Dec 2017
1 download since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Uncontrolled Keywords:Computer modelling, Coronary bifurcations, Provisional side branch stenting
Language:English
Date:2 June 2017
Deposited On:27 Dec 2017 15:00
Last Modified:19 Feb 2018 09:45
Publisher:Europa Digital and Publishing
ISSN:1774-024X
OA Status:Closed
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00498
PubMed ID:27867142

Download