Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Cumulative prospect theory and mean-variance analysis: a rigorous comparison


Hens, Thorsten; Mayer, János (2017). Cumulative prospect theory and mean-variance analysis: a rigorous comparison. Journal of Computational Finance, 21(3):47-73.

Abstract

We propose a numerical optimization approach that can be used to solve portfolio selection problems including several assets and involving objective functions from cumulative prospect theory (CPT). Implementing the suggested algorithm, we compare asset allocations that are derived for CPT based on two different methods: maximizing CPT along the mean–variance efficient frontier so that simple mean–variance algorithms can be used, and maximizing CPT without this restriction. According to the theoretical literature, with normally distributed returns and unlimited short sales, these two approaches lead to the same optimal solutions. We find that for empirical finite discrete distributions obtained via sampling and subsequent clustering from a normal distribution, the difference between the two approaches remains negligible even if short sales are restricted. However, if standard asset allocation data for pension funds is considered, the difference is considerable. Moreover, for certain types of derivatives, such as call options, the restriction of asset allocations to the mean–variance efficient frontier produces sizable losses in various respects, including decreases in expected returns and expected utility. We are able to explain these differences by CPT’s preference for positive skewness, which is not accounted for by optimizing CPT along the mean–variance efficient frontier.

Abstract

We propose a numerical optimization approach that can be used to solve portfolio selection problems including several assets and involving objective functions from cumulative prospect theory (CPT). Implementing the suggested algorithm, we compare asset allocations that are derived for CPT based on two different methods: maximizing CPT along the mean–variance efficient frontier so that simple mean–variance algorithms can be used, and maximizing CPT without this restriction. According to the theoretical literature, with normally distributed returns and unlimited short sales, these two approaches lead to the same optimal solutions. We find that for empirical finite discrete distributions obtained via sampling and subsequent clustering from a normal distribution, the difference between the two approaches remains negligible even if short sales are restricted. However, if standard asset allocation data for pension funds is considered, the difference is considerable. Moreover, for certain types of derivatives, such as call options, the restriction of asset allocations to the mean–variance efficient frontier produces sizable losses in various respects, including decreases in expected returns and expected utility. We are able to explain these differences by CPT’s preference for positive skewness, which is not accounted for by optimizing CPT along the mean–variance efficient frontier.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Downloads

0 downloads since deposited on 20 Feb 2018
0 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Banking and Finance
Dewey Decimal Classification:330 Economics
Language:English
Date:December 2017
Deposited On:20 Feb 2018 21:43
Last Modified:20 Sep 2018 04:28
Publisher:Incisive Media
ISSN:1460-1559
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.21314/JCF.2017.336
Related URLs:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3079705 (Organisation)
https://www.risk.net/journal-of-computational-finance/5363811/cumulative-prospect-theory-and-mean-variance-analysis-a-rigorous-comparison (Publisher)
Other Identification Number:merlin-id:15493

Download

Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only until 29 November 2018
Size: 681kB
View at publisher
Embargo till: 2018-11-29