Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Reliability of scoring EMG orofacial events: polysomnography compared with ambulatory recordings.

Gallo, L M; Lavigne, G; Rompré, P; Palla, S (1997). Reliability of scoring EMG orofacial events: polysomnography compared with ambulatory recordings. Journal of Sleep Research, 6(4):259-263.

Abstract

The study of sleep bruxism is usually based on clinical history, signs and symptoms. The recording of electromyographic signals with either ambulatory portable home recorders or with polysomnographic techniques in the laboratory environment allows collection of objective data. The present study showed a 100% agreement with clinical evaluation in the recognition of bruxism episodes from the masseter electromyogram recorded with portable recorders and using the polysomnographic technique. On the contrary, scorers had difficulties in discriminating between different types of episodes (phasic, tonic and mixed), the between-scorers agreement varied between 62% and 63% and the kappa-values between 0.43 and 0.33. The ideal time base at which electromyographic signals should be integrated to allow for a good discrimination of bruxism patterns is 0.06 s. The results indicate that portable electromyography recorders are a valuable complement to polysomnographic recordings of orofacial motor activities as they provide a very good recognition rate with adequate time base data collection.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic for Masticatory Disorders
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Life Sciences > Cognitive Neuroscience
Life Sciences > Behavioral Neuroscience
Language:English
Date:1 December 1997
Deposited On:11 Feb 2008 12:23
Last Modified:01 Jan 2025 04:39
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:0962-1105
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.1997.00259.x
PubMed ID:9493526
Full text not available from this repository.

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
55 citations in Web of Science®
60 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications