Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Keeping a big promise: options for baselines to assess "new and additional" climate finance


Stadelmann, Martin; Roberts, J Timmons; Michaelowa, Axel (2011). Keeping a big promise: options for baselines to assess "new and additional" climate finance. CIS Working Paper 66, University of Zurich.

Abstract

All major climate policy agreements - the UN Framework Convention, the Kyoto Protocol and recently the Copenhagen Accord - have stated that climate finance for developing countries will be ”new and additional”. However, the term “new and additional” has never been properly defined. Agreeing a system to measure a baseline from which “new and additional” funding will be calculated will be central to building trust and realising any post-Kyoto agreement. We explore eight different options for a baseline, and assess each according to several criteria: novelty to existing pledges, additionality to development assistance, environmental effectiveness, distributional consequences, and institutional and political feasibility. Only two baseline options do well on these criteria and are therefore viable: "new funds only" and "above pre-defined business as usual level of development assistance". The final section assesses the impact of the baseline definition on the novelty and additionality of “fast start finance” pledged under the 2009 Copenhagen Accord, showing that values can vary from 0 to 100% depending on the definition.

Abstract

All major climate policy agreements - the UN Framework Convention, the Kyoto Protocol and recently the Copenhagen Accord - have stated that climate finance for developing countries will be ”new and additional”. However, the term “new and additional” has never been properly defined. Agreeing a system to measure a baseline from which “new and additional” funding will be calculated will be central to building trust and realising any post-Kyoto agreement. We explore eight different options for a baseline, and assess each according to several criteria: novelty to existing pledges, additionality to development assistance, environmental effectiveness, distributional consequences, and institutional and political feasibility. Only two baseline options do well on these criteria and are therefore viable: "new funds only" and "above pre-defined business as usual level of development assistance". The final section assesses the impact of the baseline definition on the novelty and additionality of “fast start finance” pledged under the 2009 Copenhagen Accord, showing that values can vary from 0 to 100% depending on the definition.

Statistics

Citations

17 citations in Microsoft Academic

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 14 Feb 2018
1 download since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Working Paper
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:320 Political science
Uncontrolled Keywords:climate finance, Copenhagen accord, development assistance, additionality, UNFCCC
Language:English
Date:18 November 2011
Deposited On:14 Feb 2018 14:46
Last Modified:31 Jul 2018 05:09
Series Name:CIS Working Paper
Number of Pages:26
ISSN:1662-7504
OA Status:Green
Free access at:Official URL. An embargo period may apply.
Official URL:https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/cis-dam/Research/Working_Papers/WP_2010/2010_WP66_Stadelmann_Michaelowa.pdf
Related URLs:http://www.cis.ethz.ch/research/working-papers.html (Organisation)
https://www.recherche-portal.ch/ZAD:default_scope:ebi01_prod009581605 (Library Catalogue)

Download

Download PDF  'Keeping a big promise: options for baselines to assess "new and additional" climate finance'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Language: English
Filetype: PDF
Size: 381kB