Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Treatment effects of various prescriptions and techniques for fixed orthodontic appliances : A systematic review


Mousoulea, Sophia; Papageorgiou, Spyridon N; Eliades, Theodore (2017). Treatment effects of various prescriptions and techniques for fixed orthodontic appliances : A systematic review. Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 78(5):403-414.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although several prescriptions and techniques exist for comprehensive fixed appliance treatment, their treatment effects have not yet been adequately assessed in an evidence-based manner. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the therapeutic and adverse effects of various prescriptions or techniques for orthodontic appliances from randomized clinical trials on human patients.
METHODS: Eight databases were searched up to July 2016 for randomized trials assessing any orthodontic prescriptions or techniques in human patients. After elimination of duplicate studies, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane guidelines, random effects meta-analyses with mean differences (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed.
RESULTS: Compared to Roth preadjusted appliances, both Begg and modified Begg appliances were associated with statistically significantly worse occlusal outcome assessed with Peer Assessment Review (PAR) scores (1 trial, MD 3.1 points, 95% CI 1.9-4.3 points and 1 trial, MD 2.4 points, 95% CI 1.2-3.6 points, respectively) with low quality of evidence, due to bias and imprecision. Compared to a partially programmed fixed orthodontic appliance, a fully programmed appliance was associated with a statistically significant, but clinically irrelevant increase in treatment duration (1 trial, MD 2.4 months, 95% CI 0.6-4.2 months), supported by high quality of evidence. However, caution is needed in the interpretation of these results as only a limited number of small trials with methodological issues were available.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on existing trials, there is limited evidence to support any robust clinical recommendation regarding the prescriptions or techniques for fixed orthodontic appliances. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42016042727).
FUNDING: None.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although several prescriptions and techniques exist for comprehensive fixed appliance treatment, their treatment effects have not yet been adequately assessed in an evidence-based manner. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the therapeutic and adverse effects of various prescriptions or techniques for orthodontic appliances from randomized clinical trials on human patients.
METHODS: Eight databases were searched up to July 2016 for randomized trials assessing any orthodontic prescriptions or techniques in human patients. After elimination of duplicate studies, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane guidelines, random effects meta-analyses with mean differences (MD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed.
RESULTS: Compared to Roth preadjusted appliances, both Begg and modified Begg appliances were associated with statistically significantly worse occlusal outcome assessed with Peer Assessment Review (PAR) scores (1 trial, MD 3.1 points, 95% CI 1.9-4.3 points and 1 trial, MD 2.4 points, 95% CI 1.2-3.6 points, respectively) with low quality of evidence, due to bias and imprecision. Compared to a partially programmed fixed orthodontic appliance, a fully programmed appliance was associated with a statistically significant, but clinically irrelevant increase in treatment duration (1 trial, MD 2.4 months, 95% CI 0.6-4.2 months), supported by high quality of evidence. However, caution is needed in the interpretation of these results as only a limited number of small trials with methodological issues were available.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on existing trials, there is limited evidence to support any robust clinical recommendation regarding the prescriptions or techniques for fixed orthodontic appliances. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42016042727).
FUNDING: None.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
1 citation in Web of Science®
2 citations in Scopus®
1 citation in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

20 downloads since deposited on 27 Feb 2018
20 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, further contribution
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic for Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:September 2017
Deposited On:27 Feb 2018 19:00
Last Modified:10 Apr 2018 00:00
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:1434-5293
Additional Information:This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-017-0094-0
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-017-0094-0
PubMed ID:28397082

Download

Download PDF  'Treatment effects of various prescriptions and techniques for fixed orthodontic appliances : A systematic review'.
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 1MB
View at publisher