Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Influence of embryonic size and manipulation on pregnancy rates of mares after transfer of cryopreserved equine embryos


Sanchez, Roberto; Blanco, Miguel; Weiss, Julia; Rosati, Irma; Herrera, Carolina; Bollwein, Heiner; Burger, Dominik; Sieme, Harald (2017). Influence of embryonic size and manipulation on pregnancy rates of mares after transfer of cryopreserved equine embryos. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 49:54-59.

Abstract

Many years of poor results of equine embryo cryopreservation has produced a lack of confidence in this technique. Embryo cryopreservation has been successfully used for more than 20 years in other species like bovine and human. The large size of the embryos and the presence of a capsule impermeable to cryoprotectants have been the two main reasons for the failure. In the last few years, a mayor breakthrough for this technique was obtained when large equine embryos could be successfully cryopreserved after breaching the capsule and collapsing the blastocoel cavity. In the present study, we compared the pregnancy rates obtained by vitrification or cryopreservation by slow freezing of embryos smaller than 300 μm. No difference was found between vitrification and slow freezing of embryos <180 μm (pregnancy rate on day 16: 34/61, 55.7%; 6/8, 75%) but produced very low results for embryos between 180 and 300 μm in diameter (0/11, 0%; 1/7, 14.3%). Embryos larger than 300 μm were collapsed before cryopreservation, and two different types of carriers, hemi-straw or Stripper-Tip, were used for vitrification. High pregnancy rates were obtained when the hemi-straw was used as a carrier (7/10, 70% vs. 0/5, 0%), demonstrating that a minimum vitrification volume was essential to preserve the embryo viability. These findings establish that, due to the large range in diameter, equine embryos need to be cryopreserved using different protocols depending on their size.

Abstract

Many years of poor results of equine embryo cryopreservation has produced a lack of confidence in this technique. Embryo cryopreservation has been successfully used for more than 20 years in other species like bovine and human. The large size of the embryos and the presence of a capsule impermeable to cryoprotectants have been the two main reasons for the failure. In the last few years, a mayor breakthrough for this technique was obtained when large equine embryos could be successfully cryopreserved after breaching the capsule and collapsing the blastocoel cavity. In the present study, we compared the pregnancy rates obtained by vitrification or cryopreservation by slow freezing of embryos smaller than 300 μm. No difference was found between vitrification and slow freezing of embryos <180 μm (pregnancy rate on day 16: 34/61, 55.7%; 6/8, 75%) but produced very low results for embryos between 180 and 300 μm in diameter (0/11, 0%; 1/7, 14.3%). Embryos larger than 300 μm were collapsed before cryopreservation, and two different types of carriers, hemi-straw or Stripper-Tip, were used for vitrification. High pregnancy rates were obtained when the hemi-straw was used as a carrier (7/10, 70% vs. 0/5, 0%), demonstrating that a minimum vitrification volume was essential to preserve the embryo viability. These findings establish that, due to the large range in diameter, equine embryos need to be cryopreserved using different protocols depending on their size.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
3 citations in Web of Science®
3 citations in Scopus®
3 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

0 downloads since deposited on 21 Feb 2018
0 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Department of Farm Animals
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
630 Agriculture
Language:English
Date:2017
Deposited On:21 Feb 2018 12:28
Last Modified:06 May 2018 05:41
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0737-0806
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2016.10.004

Download