Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Quantifizierung des Behandlungserfolgs bei geriatrischen Sakrumfrakturen


Osterhoff, Georg; Scheyerer, Max J; Spiegl, Ulrich J; Schnake, Klaus J; Siekmann, Holger (2019). Quantifizierung des Behandlungserfolgs bei geriatrischen Sakrumfrakturen. Der Unfallchirurg, 122(4):293-298.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Geriatric sacral fractures represent an independent fracture entity of increasing incidence and growing socioeconomic relevance. The goals of treatment are very different to those in younger patients with high-energy pelvic fractures. Hence, new outcome measurement instruments are required in order to assess the success of treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Literature review summarizing existing concepts and providing an overview of outcome measurement instruments for geriatric sacral fractures.
METHODS: Narrative review article based on an analysis of the German and English-speaking literature from the last 10 years.
RESULTS: Geriatric sacral fractures result in impaired mobility, increased physical and social loss of dependency and increased morbidity and mortality rates. There is a lack of standardized specific assessment procedures for functional outcome measurement after geriatric sacral fractures. Until these are developed and validated, a parallel acquisition of mortality, the timed up and go test, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and a generic healthcare questionnaire score (SF-36, EQ-5D) seem to be most suitable.
CONCLUSION: At present our knowledge about the natural course of geriatric sacral fractures is limited by the lack of well-validated instruments to measure functional and radiographic outcomes. This has to be considered when evaluating the success of new treatment options for these patients. Future studies should validate existing scores for this population and develop new specific outcome instruments.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Geriatric sacral fractures represent an independent fracture entity of increasing incidence and growing socioeconomic relevance. The goals of treatment are very different to those in younger patients with high-energy pelvic fractures. Hence, new outcome measurement instruments are required in order to assess the success of treatment.
OBJECTIVE: Literature review summarizing existing concepts and providing an overview of outcome measurement instruments for geriatric sacral fractures.
METHODS: Narrative review article based on an analysis of the German and English-speaking literature from the last 10 years.
RESULTS: Geriatric sacral fractures result in impaired mobility, increased physical and social loss of dependency and increased morbidity and mortality rates. There is a lack of standardized specific assessment procedures for functional outcome measurement after geriatric sacral fractures. Until these are developed and validated, a parallel acquisition of mortality, the timed up and go test, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and a generic healthcare questionnaire score (SF-36, EQ-5D) seem to be most suitable.
CONCLUSION: At present our knowledge about the natural course of geriatric sacral fractures is limited by the lack of well-validated instruments to measure functional and radiographic outcomes. This has to be considered when evaluating the success of new treatment options for these patients. Future studies should validate existing scores for this population and develop new specific outcome instruments.

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Downloads

260 downloads since deposited on 30 May 2018
75 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Department of Trauma Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Surgery
Health Sciences > Emergency Medicine
Health Sciences > Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Language:German
Date:1 April 2019
Deposited On:30 May 2018 14:20
Last Modified:26 Jan 2022 16:54
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0177-5537
Additional Information:This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Der Unfallchirurg. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-018-0511-x
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-018-0511-x
PubMed ID:29797033
  • Content: Accepted Version
  • Language: German