Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

A pharmacoepidemiologic study of ranibizumab and aflibercept use 2013-2016. The Fight Retinal Blindness! Project


Barthelmes, Daniel; Nguyen, Vuong; Walton, Richard; Gillies, Mark C; Daien, Vincent (2018). A pharmacoepidemiologic study of ranibizumab and aflibercept use 2013-2016. The Fight Retinal Blindness! Project. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 256(10):1839-1846.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION To report 12-month pharmacoepidemiologic data on aflibercept and ranibizumab use in treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
METHODS Participants were treatment-naïve eyes with nAMD tracked by the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry starting therapy with aflibercept or ranibizumab treatment between January 1st, 2013 and 31st December, 2016. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between treatment groups.
RESULTS During the study period, 689 eyes initiated treatment with ranibizumab compared to 568 with aflibercept. We found a similar rate of use of both drugs. Ranibizumab-treated patients were older than aflibercept-treated patients (overall mean [SD] 82.0 [8.4] vs. 78.6 [8.1], P < 0.001). Median (Q1, Q3) lesion size was significantly larger in aflibercept-treated patients (2450 μm [1242, 3000]) compared with ranibizumab patients (2000 μm [1148, 2890], P = 0.008). Eyes treated with ranibizumab and aflibercept received a similar mean number of injections in the first 3 months (3.1 [0.7] vs. 3.0 [0.6]; P = 0.233) and at 12 months (7.3 [2.4] vs. 7.2 [2.2]; P = 0.139). The 12-month switching rates from 2013 onwards for eyes completing 12 months of follow-up were much higher for switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept (19.2%) compared with switching from aflibercept to ranibizumab (5.4%). The proportion of eyes that did not complete 12 months of treatment was 23.2% for ranibizumab and 22.2% for aflibercept-treated groups.
CONCLUSION A similar rate of use for ranibizumab and aflibercept among Australian practitioners was observed between 2013 and 2016. Ranibizumab was used more often in older patients while aflibercept tended to be used more often in eyes with larger lesions.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION To report 12-month pharmacoepidemiologic data on aflibercept and ranibizumab use in treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
METHODS Participants were treatment-naïve eyes with nAMD tracked by the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry starting therapy with aflibercept or ranibizumab treatment between January 1st, 2013 and 31st December, 2016. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between treatment groups.
RESULTS During the study period, 689 eyes initiated treatment with ranibizumab compared to 568 with aflibercept. We found a similar rate of use of both drugs. Ranibizumab-treated patients were older than aflibercept-treated patients (overall mean [SD] 82.0 [8.4] vs. 78.6 [8.1], P < 0.001). Median (Q1, Q3) lesion size was significantly larger in aflibercept-treated patients (2450 μm [1242, 3000]) compared with ranibizumab patients (2000 μm [1148, 2890], P = 0.008). Eyes treated with ranibizumab and aflibercept received a similar mean number of injections in the first 3 months (3.1 [0.7] vs. 3.0 [0.6]; P = 0.233) and at 12 months (7.3 [2.4] vs. 7.2 [2.2]; P = 0.139). The 12-month switching rates from 2013 onwards for eyes completing 12 months of follow-up were much higher for switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept (19.2%) compared with switching from aflibercept to ranibizumab (5.4%). The proportion of eyes that did not complete 12 months of treatment was 23.2% for ranibizumab and 22.2% for aflibercept-treated groups.
CONCLUSION A similar rate of use for ranibizumab and aflibercept among Australian practitioners was observed between 2013 and 2016. Ranibizumab was used more often in older patients while aflibercept tended to be used more often in eyes with larger lesions.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
2 citations in Web of Science®
3 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 29 Aug 2018
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Contributors:Fight Retinal Blindness! Study Group
Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Ophthalmology Clinic
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:27 July 2018
Deposited On:29 Aug 2018 12:46
Last Modified:24 Sep 2019 23:35
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0721-832X
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4061-2
PubMed ID:30051312

Download

Closed Access: Download allowed only for UZH members