Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Revealing and acknowledging value judgments in health technology assessment


Hofmann, Bjørn; Cleemput, Irina; Bond, Kenneth; Krones, Tanja; Droste, Sigrid; Sacchini, Dario; Oortwijn, Wija (2014). Revealing and acknowledging value judgments in health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 30(6):579-586.

Abstract

Background: Although value issues are increasingly addressed in health technology assessment (HTA) reports, HTA is still seen as a scientific endeavor and sometimes contrasted with value judgments, which are considered arbitrary and unscientific. This article aims at illustrating how numerous value judgments are at play in the HTA process, and why it is important to acknowledge and address value judgments.
Methods: A panel of experts involved in HTA, including ethicists, scrutinized the HTA process with regard to implicit value judgments. It was analyzed whether these value judgments undermine the accountability of HTA results. The final results were obtained after several rounds of deliberation.
Results: Value judgments are identified before the assessment when identifying and selecting health technologies to assess, and as part of assessment. They are at play in the processes of deciding on how to select, frame, present, summarize or synthesize information in systematic reviews. Also, in economic analysis, value judgments are ubiquitous. Addressing the ethical, legal, and social issues of a given health technology involves moral, legal, and social value judgments by definition. So do the appraisal and the decision-making process.<jats:bold>Conclusions:</jats:bold>HTA by and large is a process of value judgments. However, the preponderance of value judgments does not render HTA biased or flawed. On the contrary they are basic elements of the HTA process. Acknowledging and explicitly addressing value judgments may improve the accountability of HTA.

Abstract

Background: Although value issues are increasingly addressed in health technology assessment (HTA) reports, HTA is still seen as a scientific endeavor and sometimes contrasted with value judgments, which are considered arbitrary and unscientific. This article aims at illustrating how numerous value judgments are at play in the HTA process, and why it is important to acknowledge and address value judgments.
Methods: A panel of experts involved in HTA, including ethicists, scrutinized the HTA process with regard to implicit value judgments. It was analyzed whether these value judgments undermine the accountability of HTA results. The final results were obtained after several rounds of deliberation.
Results: Value judgments are identified before the assessment when identifying and selecting health technologies to assess, and as part of assessment. They are at play in the processes of deciding on how to select, frame, present, summarize or synthesize information in systematic reviews. Also, in economic analysis, value judgments are ubiquitous. Addressing the ethical, legal, and social issues of a given health technology involves moral, legal, and social value judgments by definition. So do the appraisal and the decision-making process.<jats:bold>Conclusions:</jats:bold>HTA by and large is a process of value judgments. However, the preponderance of value judgments does not render HTA biased or flawed. On the contrary they are basic elements of the HTA process. Acknowledging and explicitly addressing value judgments may improve the accountability of HTA.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
11 citations in Web of Science®
13 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

0 downloads since deposited on 12 Oct 2018
0 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:National licences > 142-005
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:1 December 2014
Deposited On:12 Oct 2018 17:02
Last Modified:13 Oct 2018 07:30
Publisher:Cambridge University Press
ISSN:0266-4623
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462314000671
Related URLs:https://www.swissbib.ch/Search/Results?lookfor=nationallicencecambridge101017S0266462314000671 (Library Catalogue)

Download

Content: Published Version
Language: English
Filetype: PDF (Nationallizenz 142-005) - Registered users only until 1 December 2019
Size: 171kB
View at publisher
Embargo till: 2019-12-01