Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Reciprocal effects of victimization and routine activities


Averdijk, Margit (2011). Reciprocal effects of victimization and routine activities. Journal of quantitative criminology, 27(2):125-149.

Abstract

Although there is much research on the relationship between routine activities and victimization, we have little knowledge about the reciprocal effects of victimization and routine activities. The current paper is framed within the Once Bitten Twice Shy perspective proposed by Hindelang et al. (Victims of personal crime: an empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Ballinger, Cambridge, 1978) which argues that victimization decreases risky routine activities and that this in turn decreases the risk of victimization. The current paper tests these propositions by using longitudinal data from the National Crime Victimization Survey, which allows us to tease out victimization and routine activities over time. Both violent and household victimization are examined. Variables pertaining to how often respondents go out for shopping, how often they go away at night and whether they have household devices are used as indicators for routine activities. Results indicate that the reciprocal effects of victimization and routine activities are limited. Consequences for routine activities theory are discussed

Abstract

Although there is much research on the relationship between routine activities and victimization, we have little knowledge about the reciprocal effects of victimization and routine activities. The current paper is framed within the Once Bitten Twice Shy perspective proposed by Hindelang et al. (Victims of personal crime: an empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Ballinger, Cambridge, 1978) which argues that victimization decreases risky routine activities and that this in turn decreases the risk of victimization. The current paper tests these propositions by using longitudinal data from the National Crime Victimization Survey, which allows us to tease out victimization and routine activities over time. Both violent and household victimization are examined. Variables pertaining to how often respondents go out for shopping, how often they go away at night and whether they have household devices are used as indicators for routine activities. Results indicate that the reciprocal effects of victimization and routine activities are limited. Consequences for routine activities theory are discussed

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
37 citations in Web of Science®
47 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

58 downloads since deposited on 13 Dec 2018
47 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:National licences > 142-005
Dewey Decimal Classification:Unspecified
Language:English
Date:1 June 2011
Deposited On:13 Dec 2018 16:13
Last Modified:07 Apr 2020 07:12
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0748-4518
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9106-6
Related URLs:https://www.swissbib.ch/Search/Results?lookfor=nationallicencespringer101007s1094001091066 (Library Catalogue)

Download

Green Open Access

Download PDF  'Reciprocal effects of victimization and routine activities'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Language: English
Filetype: PDF (Nationallizenz 142-005)
Size: 297kB
View at publisher