Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

The arguments of utility: Preference reversals in expected utility of income models


Lindsay, Luke (2013). The arguments of utility: Preference reversals in expected utility of income models. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 46(2):175-189.

Abstract

There is a debate in the literature about the arguments of utility in expected utility theory. Some implicitly assume utility is defined on final wealth whereas others argue it may be defined on initial wealth and income separately. I argue that making income and wealth separate arguments of utility has important implications that may not be widely recognized. A framework is presented that allows the unified treatment of expected utility models and anomalies. I show that expected utility of income models can predict framing induced preference reversals, a willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap for lotteries, and choice-value preference reversals. The main contribution is a theorem. It is proved that for all utility functions where initial wealth and income enter separately, either there will be preference reversals or preferences can be represented by a utility function defined on final wealth alone

Abstract

There is a debate in the literature about the arguments of utility in expected utility theory. Some implicitly assume utility is defined on final wealth whereas others argue it may be defined on initial wealth and income separately. I argue that making income and wealth separate arguments of utility has important implications that may not be widely recognized. A framework is presented that allows the unified treatment of expected utility models and anomalies. I show that expected utility of income models can predict framing induced preference reversals, a willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap for lotteries, and choice-value preference reversals. The main contribution is a theorem. It is proved that for all utility functions where initial wealth and income enter separately, either there will be preference reversals or preferences can be represented by a utility function defined on final wealth alone

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
4 citations in Web of Science®
4 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

26 downloads since deposited on 04 Jul 2019
26 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:National licences > 142-005
Dewey Decimal Classification:330 Economics
Language:English
Date:1 April 2013
Deposited On:04 Jul 2019 15:11
Last Modified:07 Apr 2020 07:12
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0895-5646
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-013-9162-z
Related URLs:https://www.swissbib.ch/Search/Results?lookfor=nationallicencespringer101007s111660139162z (Library Catalogue)

Download

Green Open Access

Download PDF  'The arguments of utility: Preference reversals in expected utility of income models'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Language: English
Filetype: PDF (Nationallizenz 142-005)
Size: 299kB
View at publisher