Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study


Breckwoldt, Jan; Svensson, Jörg; Lingemann, Christian; Gruber, Hans (2014). Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study. BMC Medical Education, 14:6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Teacher training may improve teaching effectiveness, but it might also have paradoxical effects. Research on expertise development suggests that the integration of new strategies may result in a temporary deterioration of performance until higher levels of competence are reached. In this study, the impact of a clinical teacher training on teaching effectiveness was assessed in an intensive course in emergency medicine. As primary study outcome students' practical skills at the end of their course were chosen. METHODS The authors matched 18 clinical teachers according to clinical experience and teaching experience and then randomly assigned them to a two-day-teacher training, or no training. After 14 days, both groups taught within a 12-hour intensive course in emergency medicine for undergraduate students. The course followed a clearly defined curriculum. After the course students were assessed by structured clinical examination (SCE) and MCQ. The teaching quality was rated by students using a questionnaire. RESULTS Data for 96 students with trained teachers, and 97 students with untrained teachers were included. Students taught by untrained teachers performed better in the SCE domains 'alarm call' (p < 0.01) and 'ventilation' (p = 0.01), while the domains 'chest compressions' and 'use of automated defibrillator' did not differ. MCQ scores revealed no statistical difference. Overall, teaching quality was rated significantly better by students of untrained teachers (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS At the end of a structured intensive course in emergency medicine, students of trained clinical teachers performed worse in 2 of 4 practical SCE domains compared to students of untrained teachers. In addition, subjective evaluations of teaching quality were worse in the group of trained teachers. Difficulties in integrating new strategies in their teaching styles might be a possible explanation.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Teacher training may improve teaching effectiveness, but it might also have paradoxical effects. Research on expertise development suggests that the integration of new strategies may result in a temporary deterioration of performance until higher levels of competence are reached. In this study, the impact of a clinical teacher training on teaching effectiveness was assessed in an intensive course in emergency medicine. As primary study outcome students' practical skills at the end of their course were chosen. METHODS The authors matched 18 clinical teachers according to clinical experience and teaching experience and then randomly assigned them to a two-day-teacher training, or no training. After 14 days, both groups taught within a 12-hour intensive course in emergency medicine for undergraduate students. The course followed a clearly defined curriculum. After the course students were assessed by structured clinical examination (SCE) and MCQ. The teaching quality was rated by students using a questionnaire. RESULTS Data for 96 students with trained teachers, and 97 students with untrained teachers were included. Students taught by untrained teachers performed better in the SCE domains 'alarm call' (p < 0.01) and 'ventilation' (p = 0.01), while the domains 'chest compressions' and 'use of automated defibrillator' did not differ. MCQ scores revealed no statistical difference. Overall, teaching quality was rated significantly better by students of untrained teachers (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS At the end of a structured intensive course in emergency medicine, students of trained clinical teachers performed worse in 2 of 4 practical SCE domains compared to students of untrained teachers. In addition, subjective evaluations of teaching quality were worse in the group of trained teachers. Difficulties in integrating new strategies in their teaching styles might be a possible explanation.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
14 citations in Web of Science®
14 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

41 downloads since deposited on 07 Dec 2018
37 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Anesthesiology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Uncontrolled Keywords:medical education; faculty development; emergency medicine; objective structured clinical examination; OSCE
Language:English
Date:8 January 2014
Deposited On:07 Dec 2018 11:04
Last Modified:06 Oct 2019 05:56
Publisher:BioMed Central
ISSN:1472-6920
OA Status:Gold
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-6
PubMed ID:24400838

Download

Gold Open Access

Download PDF  'Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 238kB
View at publisher
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0)