Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Effect of different head and neck positions on kinematics of elite dressage horses ridden at walk on treadmill

Rhodin, M; Byström, A; Roepstorff, L; Hernlund, E; van Weeren, P R; Weishaupt, Michael A; Egenvall, A (2018). Effect of different head and neck positions on kinematics of elite dressage horses ridden at walk on treadmill. Comparative Exercise Physiology, 14(2):69-78.

Abstract

The debate on proper head and neck positions (HNP) in horse training is lively, but little is known about the biomechanical effects of various HNPs in horses ridden at walk. The aim was to quantify the influence of different HNPs on the kinematics of horses ridden at walk. The standard competition position (HNP2) was compared to a free, unrestrained position (HNP1), more flexed positions (HNP3, HNP4), a raised extended position (HNP5) and a forward-downward extended position (HNP6). An experimental study in seven high-level dressage horses ridden at walk on a treadmill was designed. Kinetic and kinematic measurements were obtained with different HNPs. HNP2 was used as a speed-matched reference. Kinematics were measured from skin-fixed markers recorded by high-speed video cameras. The kinetics of the limbs were measured by the force-measuring instrumentation of the treadmill. In HNP1, compared to HNP2, the lumbar back and the pelvis were more horizontally positioned (more extended), and fore- and hindlimb pro- and retraction increased, with increased caudal rotation of the femur during the second half of hindlimb stance. HNP6 induced similar changes as HNP1, but caused larger increases in forelimb pro- and retraction. In HNP3, HNP4 and HNP5 the pelvis was more angled (less extended) compared to HNP2 at hindlimb midstance, and in HNP3 and HNP4 also in early hindlimb stance. All three HNPs caused increased maximum flexion of the tarsus, stifle and metatarsophalangeal joint during the swing phase. HNP3 and HNP5, but not HNP4, had a decreasing influence on fore- and hindlimb pro- and retraction, and decreased caudal rotation of the femur during the second half of hindlimb stance.The main limitation was that horses were not ridden overground and the number of horses was small. Our conclusion was that changes in head and neck position can markedly affect the horse’s movement pattern at walk.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Equine Department
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
630 Agriculture
Scopus Subject Areas:Life Sciences > Biophysics
Health Sciences > Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Life Sciences > Biochemistry
Life Sciences > Physiology
Health Sciences > Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Health Sciences > Veterinary (miscellaneous)
Health Sciences > Physiology (medical)
Uncontrolled Keywords:Biophysics, Physiology (medical), Biochemistry, Physiology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Veterinary, Equine, Kinematics, Back, Rider
Language:English
Date:6 June 2018
Deposited On:10 Dec 2018 15:18
Last Modified:27 Aug 2024 03:37
Publisher:Wageningen Academic Publishers
ISSN:1755-2540
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.3920/cep180002
Download PDF  'Effect of different head and neck positions on kinematics of elite dressage horses ridden at walk on treadmill'.
Preview
  • Content: Published Version
  • Language: English
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
9 citations in Web of Science®
9 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

305 downloads since deposited on 10 Dec 2018
29 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications