Abstract
Thromboembolism is a serious complication of induction therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We prospectively compared efficacy and safety of antithrombotic interventions in the consecutive leukemia trials ALL-BFM 2000 and AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009. Patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=949, age 1 to 18 years) were randomized to receive low-dose unfractionated heparin, prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) or activity-adapted antithrombin throughout induction therapy. Primary objective was to test whether enoxaparin or antithrombin reduce the incidence of thromboembolism as compared to unfractionated heparin. Principal safety outcome was hemorrhage; leukemia outcome was a secondary endpoint. Thromboembolism occurred in 42 patients (4.4%). Patients assigned to unfractionated heparin had a higher risk of thromboembolism (8.0%) compared with those randomized to enoxaparin (3.5%; P=0.011) or antithrombin (1.9%; P<0.001). The proportion of patients who refused antithrombotic treatment as allocated was 3% in the unfractionated heparin or antithrombin, and 33% in the enoxaparin arm. Major hemorrhage occurred in eight patients (no differences between the groups). 5-year-event free survival was 80.9±2.2% if assigned to antithrombin compared to 85.9±2.0% in the unfractionated heparin (P=0.06), and 86.2±2.0% in the enoxaparin group (P=0.10). In conclusion, prophylactic use of antithrombin or enoxaparin significantly reduced thromboembolism. Despite the considerable number of patients rejecting the assigned treatment with subcutaneous injections, the result remains nonambiguous. Thromboprophylaxis - for the present time primarily with enoxaparin - can be recommended for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia during induction therapy. Whether and how antithrombin may affect leukemia outcome remains to be determined.
Greiner, Jeanette