Abstract
BACKGROUND
This project was undertaken to generate a core set of items to develop classification criteria for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) using consensus methodology.
METHODS
An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was invited to participate in a 3-round Delphi exercise developed using a survey based on items identified by a scoping review. In Round 1, participants were asked to identify omissions and clarify ambiguities regarding the items in the survey. In Round 2, participants were asked to rate the validity and feasibility of the items using Likert-type scales ranging from 1-9 (1= very invalid/unfeasible, 5 = uncertain, 9 = very valid/feasible). In Round 3, participants reviewed the results and comments of Round 2, and were asked to provide final ratings. Items rated as highly valid and feasible (both median scores ≥7) in Round 3 were selected as the provisional core set of items. A consensus meeting using nominal group technique (NGT) followed to further reduce the core set of items.
RESULTS
Ninety-nine experts from 16 countries participated in the Delphi exercise. Of the 31 items in the survey, consensus was achieved on 13, including hypertension, renal insufficiency, proteinuria and hemolysis. Eleven experts took part in the NGT discussion, where consensus was achieved in 5 domains: blood pressure, acute kidney injury, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, target organ dysfunction, and renal histopathology.
CONCLUSIONS
A core set of items that characterize SRC was identified using consensus methodology. This core set will be used in future data-driven phases of this project to develop classification criteria for SRC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Butler, Emily-Ann