Diagnosis and treatment choices of suspected benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: current approach of general practitioners, neurologists, and ENT physicians
PURPOSE: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a frequently underdiagnosed cause of vertigo, potentially due to the underuse of diagnostic and therapeutic canalith repositioning procedures (CRPs). We aimed to investigate self-reported use of the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to BPPV patients by Lithuanian neurologists, ear, nose, and throat (ENT) physicians, and general practitioners (GPs), and to explore potential reasons for the underuse of the maneuvers. METHODS: Neurologists, ENT physicians, and GPs were invited to complete a written questionnaire focused on diagnostic and therapeutic practices related to BPPV. Between-group differences and associations between responses were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: In total, 97 neurologists, 85 ENT physicians and 142 GPs (21.1%, 26.8%, and 5.7%, respectively, of all corresponding licensed Lithuanian physicians) completed the questionnaire. 24% of neurologists, 33% ENT physicians and 50% GPs do not perform diagnostic maneuvers for patients with suspected BPPV, and 28%, 61%, and 84%, respectively, do not perform CRPs. Years of clinical experience was a negative predictor of CRP performance [OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), p = 0.001]. Frequent reasons for not performing CRPs were time taken for the procedure, fear of provoking symptoms, and lack of knowledge. All physicians frequently ordered additional imaging or consultations for suspected BPPV and reported prescribing a range of medications. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of Lithuanian neurologists, ENT physicians, and GPs do not employ diagnostic maneuvers and CRPs for BPPV patients, contrary to established guidelines. Lack of expertise and time available is a common culprit that leads to unnecessary drug prescribing and investigation.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a frequently underdiagnosed cause of vertigo, potentially due to the underuse of diagnostic and therapeutic canalith repositioning procedures (CRPs). We aimed to investigate self-reported use of the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to BPPV patients by Lithuanian neurologists, ear, nose, and throat (ENT) physicians, and general practitioners (GPs), and to explore potential reasons for the underuse of the maneuvers. METHODS: Neurologists, ENT physicians, and GPs were invited to complete a written questionnaire focused on diagnostic and therapeutic practices related to BPPV. Between-group differences and associations between responses were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: In total, 97 neurologists, 85 ENT physicians and 142 GPs (21.1%, 26.8%, and 5.7%, respectively, of all corresponding licensed Lithuanian physicians) completed the questionnaire. 24% of neurologists, 33% ENT physicians and 50% GPs do not perform diagnostic maneuvers for patients with suspected BPPV, and 28%, 61%, and 84%, respectively, do not perform CRPs. Years of clinical experience was a negative predictor of CRP performance [OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), p = 0.001]. Frequent reasons for not performing CRPs were time taken for the procedure, fear of provoking symptoms, and lack of knowledge. All physicians frequently ordered additional imaging or consultations for suspected BPPV and reported prescribing a range of medications. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of Lithuanian neurologists, ENT physicians, and GPs do not employ diagnostic maneuvers and CRPs for BPPV patients, contrary to established guidelines. Lack of expertise and time available is a common culprit that leads to unnecessary drug prescribing and investigation.
TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.