Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Decomposing complementizers: the fseq of French, Modern Greek, Serbo-Croatian and Bulgarian complementizers


Baunaz, Lena (2018). Decomposing complementizers: the fseq of French, Modern Greek, Serbo-Croatian and Bulgarian complementizers. In: Baunaz, Lena; De Clercq, Karen; Haegeman, Liliane; Lander, Eric. Exploring Nanosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 149-179.

Abstract

This chapter discusses the morphosyntax of French, Modern Greek, Serbo-Croatian, and Bulgarian complementizers equivalent to English that. From long-distance wh-extractions across complementizers in these languages, it is shown that (i) the morpheme complementizer is composed of features that are hierarchically ordered according to a functional sequence (fseq) (see Baunaz 2015, 2016a; Baunaz and Lander to appear); (ii) the complementizer morpheme lexicalizes structures of different sizes; (iii) the distribution of complementizers is governed by veridicality (see Baunaz 2015, 2016a); (iv) the complementizer morpheme is syntactically active. The basic template for complementizers that I argue for is F4 > F3 > F2 > F1. Evidence in favor of this template comes from crosslinguistic patterns of syncretism and featural Relativized Minimality (Starke 2001; Rizzi 2004; Haegeman 2010, among others). Evidence in favor of different realizations of the complementizer is provided by means of long-distance extractions across declarative embedded clauses.

Abstract

This chapter discusses the morphosyntax of French, Modern Greek, Serbo-Croatian, and Bulgarian complementizers equivalent to English that. From long-distance wh-extractions across complementizers in these languages, it is shown that (i) the morpheme complementizer is composed of features that are hierarchically ordered according to a functional sequence (fseq) (see Baunaz 2015, 2016a; Baunaz and Lander to appear); (ii) the complementizer morpheme lexicalizes structures of different sizes; (iii) the distribution of complementizers is governed by veridicality (see Baunaz 2015, 2016a); (iv) the complementizer morpheme is syntactically active. The basic template for complementizers that I argue for is F4 > F3 > F2 > F1. Evidence in favor of this template comes from crosslinguistic patterns of syncretism and featural Relativized Minimality (Starke 2001; Rizzi 2004; Haegeman 2010, among others). Evidence in favor of different realizations of the complementizer is provided by means of long-distance extractions across declarative embedded clauses.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Downloads

98 downloads since deposited on 15 Feb 2019
27 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Book Section, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Romance Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:800 Literature, rhetoric & criticism
470 Latin & Italic languages
410 Linguistics
440 French & related languages
460 Spanish & Portuguese languages
450 Italian, Romanian & related languages
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > General Arts and Humanities
Social Sciences & Humanities > General Social Sciences
Uncontrolled Keywords:complementizer, presupposition, veridicality, featural Relativized Minimality, islands
Language:English
Date:2018
Deposited On:15 Feb 2019 08:07
Last Modified:26 Jan 2022 20:57
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Series Name:Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax
ISBN:978-0-19-087675-3
Additional Information:This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190876746.003.0006
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190876746.003.0006