Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Randomised trials with provision for early stopping for benefit (or harm): The impact on the estimated treatment effect


Walter, S D; Guyatt, G H; Bassler, D; Briel, M; Ramsay, T; Han, H D (2019). Randomised trials with provision for early stopping for benefit (or harm): The impact on the estimated treatment effect. Statistics in Medicine, 38(14):2524-2543.

Abstract

Stopping rules for clinical trials are primarily intended to control Type I error rates if interim analyses are planned, but less is known about the impact that potential stopping has on estimating treatment benefit. In this paper, we derive analytic expressions for (1) the over-estimation of benefit in studies that stop early, (2) the under-estimation of benefit in completed studies, and (3) the overall bias in studies with a stopping rule. We also examine the probability of stopping early and the situation in meta-analyses. Numerical evaluations show that the greatest concern is with over-estimation of benefit in stopped studies, especially if the probability of stopping early is small. The overall bias is usually less than 10% of the true benefit, and under-estimation in completed studies is also typically small. The probability of stopping depends on the true treatment effect and sample size. The magnitude of these effects depends on the particular rule adopted, but we show that the maximum overall bias is the same for all stopping rules. We also show that an essentially unbiased meta-analysis estimate of benefit can be recovered, even if some component studies have stopping rules. We illustrate these methods using data from three clinical trials. The results confirm our earlier empirical work on clinical trials. Investigators may consult our numerical results for guidance on potential mis-estimation and bias in the treatment effect if a stopping rule is adopted. Particular concern is warranted in studies that actually stop early, where interim results may be quite misleading.

Abstract

Stopping rules for clinical trials are primarily intended to control Type I error rates if interim analyses are planned, but less is known about the impact that potential stopping has on estimating treatment benefit. In this paper, we derive analytic expressions for (1) the over-estimation of benefit in studies that stop early, (2) the under-estimation of benefit in completed studies, and (3) the overall bias in studies with a stopping rule. We also examine the probability of stopping early and the situation in meta-analyses. Numerical evaluations show that the greatest concern is with over-estimation of benefit in stopped studies, especially if the probability of stopping early is small. The overall bias is usually less than 10% of the true benefit, and under-estimation in completed studies is also typically small. The probability of stopping depends on the true treatment effect and sample size. The magnitude of these effects depends on the particular rule adopted, but we show that the maximum overall bias is the same for all stopping rules. We also show that an essentially unbiased meta-analysis estimate of benefit can be recovered, even if some component studies have stopping rules. We illustrate these methods using data from three clinical trials. The results confirm our earlier empirical work on clinical trials. Investigators may consult our numerical results for guidance on potential mis-estimation and bias in the treatment effect if a stopping rule is adopted. Particular concern is warranted in studies that actually stop early, where interim results may be quite misleading.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
1 citation in Web of Science®
1 citation in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 31 Jul 2019
1 download since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Neonatology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:30 June 2019
Deposited On:31 Jul 2019 10:30
Last Modified:25 Sep 2019 00:38
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
ISSN:0277-6715
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8142
Official URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sim.8142
PubMed ID:30887553

Download

Closed Access: Download allowed only for UZH members