Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

The ambivalent role of idiosyncratic risk in asymmetric tournaments


Bäker, Agnes; Pull, Kerstin; Bäker, Hendrik (2013). The ambivalent role of idiosyncratic risk in asymmetric tournaments. Theoretical Economics Letters, 3(3A):16-22.

Abstract

In our paper, we analyze the interplay of contestant heterogeneity and idiosyncratic risk in rank-order tournaments: While in symmetric tournaments an increase in idiosyncratic risk reduces incentives, in asymmetric tournaments this is not necessarily the case: Rather, we show that increasing the level of idiosyncratic risk in asymmetric tournaments will at first increase and - only after a critical risk level has been reached - reduce incentives. We find this critical risk level to be higher, the larger the degree of contestant heterogeneity. Concerning practical implications, it is more important to reduce idiosyncratic risk in the tournament when contestants are similar and less beneficial when contestants are heterogeneous. In light of the fact that equilibrium effort levels in tournaments with a low level of contestant heterogeneity are by far higher than those in tournaments with high levels of contestant heterogeneity, the advice would be to simultaneously reduce contestant heterogeneity (e.g., by league-building or handicapping) and idiosyncratic risk.

Abstract

In our paper, we analyze the interplay of contestant heterogeneity and idiosyncratic risk in rank-order tournaments: While in symmetric tournaments an increase in idiosyncratic risk reduces incentives, in asymmetric tournaments this is not necessarily the case: Rather, we show that increasing the level of idiosyncratic risk in asymmetric tournaments will at first increase and - only after a critical risk level has been reached - reduce incentives. We find this critical risk level to be higher, the larger the degree of contestant heterogeneity. Concerning practical implications, it is more important to reduce idiosyncratic risk in the tournament when contestants are similar and less beneficial when contestants are heterogeneous. In light of the fact that equilibrium effort levels in tournaments with a low level of contestant heterogeneity are by far higher than those in tournaments with high levels of contestant heterogeneity, the advice would be to simultaneously reduce contestant heterogeneity (e.g., by league-building or handicapping) and idiosyncratic risk.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Downloads

16 downloads since deposited on 23 Aug 2019
12 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Business Administration
Dewey Decimal Classification:330 Economics
Language:English
Date:2013
Deposited On:23 Aug 2019 12:42
Last Modified:31 Jul 2020 03:34
Publisher:Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.
ISSN:2162-2086
OA Status:Green
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2013.33A004
Other Identification Number:merlin-id:13362

Download

Green Open Access

Download PDF  'The ambivalent role of idiosyncratic risk in asymmetric tournaments'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 256kB
View at publisher
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)