Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction


Lindenblatt, Nicole; Gruenherz, Lisanne; Farhadi, Jian (2019). A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Gland Surgery, 8(4):389-398.

Abstract

Background
The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) has gained widespread popularity in autologous breast reconstruction due to its natural aesthetic results and muscle-sparing design. However, donor site results regarding aesthetic outcome are often less favorable. Despite several studies on surgical technique and improvements of flap harvest, only a small number of studies addressing donor site aesthetic exist.
Methods
A systematic review was performed on donor site aesthetic after DIEP flap harvest according to the PRISMA guidelines. Secondary interests were abdominal wall morbidity and complication rates in general. The following electronic databases were included to identify relevant studies: Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science.
Results
The search yielded 95 articles for full-text analysis, with only four key studies found on donor site aesthetic specifically. Regarding complication rates, the overall rate of abdominal hernia ranges from 0 to 7.1%. Abdominal bulging occurs in 2.3% to 33%. Besides abdominal wall integrity, wound dehiscence (12-39%), seroma (1-48%), hematoma (1-15%), infections (1-12%), fat necrosis (0-11%) and umbilical necrosis (2-3%) significantly impair donor site aesthetic.
Conclusions
This systematic review reveals that the topic of donor site aesthetic and potential improvement of results has largely been neglected in the past decade. This study provides a thorough evaluation of potential problems that plastic surgeons may encounter and includes recommendations to improve results.

Abstract

Background
The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) has gained widespread popularity in autologous breast reconstruction due to its natural aesthetic results and muscle-sparing design. However, donor site results regarding aesthetic outcome are often less favorable. Despite several studies on surgical technique and improvements of flap harvest, only a small number of studies addressing donor site aesthetic exist.
Methods
A systematic review was performed on donor site aesthetic after DIEP flap harvest according to the PRISMA guidelines. Secondary interests were abdominal wall morbidity and complication rates in general. The following electronic databases were included to identify relevant studies: Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science.
Results
The search yielded 95 articles for full-text analysis, with only four key studies found on donor site aesthetic specifically. Regarding complication rates, the overall rate of abdominal hernia ranges from 0 to 7.1%. Abdominal bulging occurs in 2.3% to 33%. Besides abdominal wall integrity, wound dehiscence (12-39%), seroma (1-48%), hematoma (1-15%), infections (1-12%), fat necrosis (0-11%) and umbilical necrosis (2-3%) significantly impair donor site aesthetic.
Conclusions
This systematic review reveals that the topic of donor site aesthetic and potential improvement of results has largely been neglected in the past decade. This study provides a thorough evaluation of potential problems that plastic surgeons may encounter and includes recommendations to improve results.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
46 citations in Web of Science®
44 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

255 downloads since deposited on 01 Nov 2019
29 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Reconstructive Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Surgery
Language:English
Date:August 2019
Deposited On:01 Nov 2019 14:22
Last Modified:22 Sep 2023 01:48
Publisher:AME Publishing Company
ISSN:2227-684X
OA Status:Green
Free access at:PubMed ID. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.06.05
PubMed ID:31538064
  • Content: Published Version