Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Does the complexity in temporal precipitation disaggregation matter for a lumped hydrological model?


Müller-Thomy, Hannes; Sikorska-Senoner, Anna E (2019). Does the complexity in temporal precipitation disaggregation matter for a lumped hydrological model? Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64(12):1453-1471.

Abstract

Flood peaks and volumes are essential design variables and can be simulated by precipitation–runoff (P–R) modelling. The high-resolution precipitation time series that are often required for this purpose can be generated by various temporal disaggregation methods. Here, we compare a simple method (M1, one parameter), focusing on the effective precipitation duration for flood simulations, with a multiplicative cascade model (M2, 32/36 parameters). While M2 aims at generating realistic characteristics of precipitation time series, M1 aims only at accurately reproducing flood variables by P–R modelling. Both disaggregation methods were tested on precipitation time series of nine Swiss mesoscale catchments. The generated high-resolution time series served as input for P–R modelling using a lumped HBV model. The results indicate that differences identified in precipitation characteristics of disaggregated time series vanish when introduced into the lumped hydrological model. Moreover, flood peaks were more sensitive than flood volumes to the choice of disaggregation method.

Abstract

Flood peaks and volumes are essential design variables and can be simulated by precipitation–runoff (P–R) modelling. The high-resolution precipitation time series that are often required for this purpose can be generated by various temporal disaggregation methods. Here, we compare a simple method (M1, one parameter), focusing on the effective precipitation duration for flood simulations, with a multiplicative cascade model (M2, 32/36 parameters). While M2 aims at generating realistic characteristics of precipitation time series, M1 aims only at accurately reproducing flood variables by P–R modelling. Both disaggregation methods were tested on precipitation time series of nine Swiss mesoscale catchments. The generated high-resolution time series served as input for P–R modelling using a lumped HBV model. The results indicate that differences identified in precipitation characteristics of disaggregated time series vanish when introduced into the lumped hydrological model. Moreover, flood peaks were more sensitive than flood volumes to the choice of disaggregation method.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Downloads

11 downloads since deposited on 18 Dec 2019
11 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography
Dewey Decimal Classification:910 Geography & travel
Uncontrolled Keywords:Water Science and Technology
Language:English
Date:10 September 2019
Deposited On:18 Dec 2019 12:34
Last Modified:18 Dec 2019 12:34
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0262-6667
Additional Information:This is an electronic version of an article published in Hydrological Sciences Journal. Hydrological Sciences Journal is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=t911751996
OA Status:Green
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1638926

Download

Green Open Access

Download PDF  'Does the complexity in temporal precipitation disaggregation matter for a lumped hydrological model?'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Language: English
Filetype: PDF
Size: 3MB
View at publisher