Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Effect of Continuous Epinephrine Infusion on Survival in Critically Ill Patients. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials


Belletti, Alessandro; Nagy, Adam; Sartorelli, Marianna; Mucchetti, Marta; Putzu, Alessandro; Sartini, Chiara; Morselli, Federica; De Domenico, Pierfrancesco; Zangrillo, Alberto; Landoni, Giovanni; Lembo, Rosalba (2020). Effect of Continuous Epinephrine Infusion on Survival in Critically Ill Patients. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Critical Care Medicine, 48(3):398-405.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
Epinephrine is frequently used as an inotropic and vasopressor agent in critically ill patients requiring hemodynamic support. Data from observational trials suggested that epinephrine use is associated with a worse outcome as compared with other adrenergic and nonadrenergic vasoactive drugs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effect of epinephrine administration on outcome of critically ill patients.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register were searched by two independent investigators up to March 2019.
STUDY SELECTION
Inclusion criteria were: administration of epinephrine as IV continuous infusion, patients admitted to an ICU or undergoing major surgery, and randomized controlled trials. Studies on epinephrine administration as bolus (e.g., during cardiopulmonary resuscitation), were excluded. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two independent investigators examined and extracted data from eligible trials.
DATA SYNTHESIS
A total of 5,249 studies were assessed, with a total of 12 studies (1,227 patients) finally included in the meta-analysis. The majority of the trials were performed in the setting of septic shock, and the most frequent comparator was a combination of norepinephrine plus dobutamine. We found no difference in all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up available (197/579 [34.0%] in the epinephrine group vs 219/648 [33.8%] in the control group; risk ratio = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.10; p = 0.49; I = 0%). No differences in the need for renal replacement therapy, occurrence rate of myocardial ischemia, occurrence rate of arrhythmias, and length of ICU stay were observed.
CONCLUSIONS
Current randomized evidence showed that continuous IV administration of epinephrine as inotropic/vasopressor agent is not associated with a worse outcome in critically ill patients.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
Epinephrine is frequently used as an inotropic and vasopressor agent in critically ill patients requiring hemodynamic support. Data from observational trials suggested that epinephrine use is associated with a worse outcome as compared with other adrenergic and nonadrenergic vasoactive drugs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effect of epinephrine administration on outcome of critically ill patients.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register were searched by two independent investigators up to March 2019.
STUDY SELECTION
Inclusion criteria were: administration of epinephrine as IV continuous infusion, patients admitted to an ICU or undergoing major surgery, and randomized controlled trials. Studies on epinephrine administration as bolus (e.g., during cardiopulmonary resuscitation), were excluded. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two independent investigators examined and extracted data from eligible trials.
DATA SYNTHESIS
A total of 5,249 studies were assessed, with a total of 12 studies (1,227 patients) finally included in the meta-analysis. The majority of the trials were performed in the setting of septic shock, and the most frequent comparator was a combination of norepinephrine plus dobutamine. We found no difference in all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up available (197/579 [34.0%] in the epinephrine group vs 219/648 [33.8%] in the control group; risk ratio = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.10; p = 0.49; I = 0%). No differences in the need for renal replacement therapy, occurrence rate of myocardial ischemia, occurrence rate of arrhythmias, and length of ICU stay were observed.
CONCLUSIONS
Current randomized evidence showed that continuous IV administration of epinephrine as inotropic/vasopressor agent is not associated with a worse outcome in critically ill patients.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Downloads

5 downloads since deposited on 22 Jan 2020
5 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Cardiocentro Ticino
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:1 March 2020
Deposited On:22 Jan 2020 13:08
Last Modified:15 Feb 2020 02:06
Publisher:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ISSN:0090-3493
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004127
PubMed ID:31789701

Download

Closed Access: Download allowed only for UZH members