Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Foreseeing the future of mutualistic communities beyond collapse


Lever, J Jelle; van de Leemput, Ingrid A; Weinans, Els; Quax, Rick; Dakos, Vasilis; van Nes, Egbert H; Bascompte, Jordi; Scheffer, Marten (2020). Foreseeing the future of mutualistic communities beyond collapse. Ecology Letters, 23(1):2-15.

Abstract

Changing conditions may lead to sudden shifts in the state of ecosystems when critical thresholds are passed. Some well-studied drivers of such transitions lead to predictable outcomes such as a turbid lake or a degraded landscape. Many ecosystems are, however, complex systems of many interacting species. While detecting upcoming transitions in such systems is challenging, predicting what comes after a critical transition is terra incognita altogether. The problem is that complex ecosystems may shift to many different, alternative states. Whether an impending transition has minor, positive or catastrophic effects is thus unclear. Some systems may, however, behave more predictably than others. The dynamics of mutualistic communities can be expected to be relatively simple, because delayed negative feedbacks leading to oscillatory or other complex dynamics are weak. Here, we address the question of whether this relative simplicity allows us to foresee a community’s future state. As a case study, we use a model of a bipartite mutualistic network and show that a network’s post-transition state is indicated by the way in which a system recovers from minor disturbances. Similar results obtained with a unipartite model of facilitation suggest that our results are of relevance to a wide range of mutualistic systems.

Abstract

Changing conditions may lead to sudden shifts in the state of ecosystems when critical thresholds are passed. Some well-studied drivers of such transitions lead to predictable outcomes such as a turbid lake or a degraded landscape. Many ecosystems are, however, complex systems of many interacting species. While detecting upcoming transitions in such systems is challenging, predicting what comes after a critical transition is terra incognita altogether. The problem is that complex ecosystems may shift to many different, alternative states. Whether an impending transition has minor, positive or catastrophic effects is thus unclear. Some systems may, however, behave more predictably than others. The dynamics of mutualistic communities can be expected to be relatively simple, because delayed negative feedbacks leading to oscillatory or other complex dynamics are weak. Here, we address the question of whether this relative simplicity allows us to foresee a community’s future state. As a case study, we use a model of a bipartite mutualistic network and show that a network’s post-transition state is indicated by the way in which a system recovers from minor disturbances. Similar results obtained with a unipartite model of facilitation suggest that our results are of relevance to a wide range of mutualistic systems.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
26 citations in Web of Science®
24 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

27 downloads since deposited on 18 Feb 2020
6 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
590 Animals (Zoology)
Scopus Subject Areas:Life Sciences > Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Uncontrolled Keywords:Critical transitions, ecological networks, mutualistic communities, critical slowing down, predictive ecology, forecasting, global environmental change
Language:English
Date:1 January 2020
Deposited On:18 Feb 2020 16:11
Last Modified:23 Nov 2023 02:43
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
ISSN:1461-023X
OA Status:Hybrid
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13401
  • Content: Published Version
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)