STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The lengthy sintering time of zirconia is costly and limits applications. The consequences of shortening the sintering time are mainly unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to test and compare 2 high-speed sintering protocols and 1 conventional sintering protocol on the translucency, phase content, grain sizes, and flexural strength of 3 zirconia materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 450 specimens of 3 zirconia materials-two were 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (3Y-TZPs), Ceramill ZI and Zolid (ZD), and a 4 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (4Y-TZP), Zolid HT+ (n=150)-and 5 thicknesses (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mm; n=30) were sintered according to 2 high-speed sintering protocols (final temperature 1570 °C and 1590 °C; n=10) and a reference sintering protocol (1450 °C; n=10). After measuring the monoclinic phase content with Raman spectrometry (n=3), the specimens were polished, and translucency was determined. The biaxial flexural strength of specimens with a thickness of 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm was tested (n=20). Statistical evaluation included 1-way ANOVA, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and Spearman-Rho tests and the Bonferroni correction (α=.0011). RESULTS: For ZI, the sintering protocols did not affect the translucency or biaxial flexural strength. ZD and HT+ showed significantly lower translucency for high-speed sintering protocols (P≤.001), but the biaxial flexural strength remained the same after the high-speed sintering protocol at 1590 °C. Grain sizes increased with increasing final sintering temperature for ZI and HT+, whereas translucency generally decreased with increasing material thickness. No monoclinic phase was detected in any group. CONCLUSIONS: The flexural strength was maintained with high-speed sintering but led to a decrease in translucency for ZD and HT+.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The lengthy sintering time of zirconia is costly and limits applications. The consequences of shortening the sintering time are mainly unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to test and compare 2 high-speed sintering protocols and 1 conventional sintering protocol on the translucency, phase content, grain sizes, and flexural strength of 3 zirconia materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 450 specimens of 3 zirconia materials-two were 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (3Y-TZPs), Ceramill ZI and Zolid (ZD), and a 4 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (4Y-TZP), Zolid HT+ (n=150)-and 5 thicknesses (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 mm; n=30) were sintered according to 2 high-speed sintering protocols (final temperature 1570 °C and 1590 °C; n=10) and a reference sintering protocol (1450 °C; n=10). After measuring the monoclinic phase content with Raman spectrometry (n=3), the specimens were polished, and translucency was determined. The biaxial flexural strength of specimens with a thickness of 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm was tested (n=20). Statistical evaluation included 1-way ANOVA, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and Spearman-Rho tests and the Bonferroni correction (α=.0011). RESULTS: For ZI, the sintering protocols did not affect the translucency or biaxial flexural strength. ZD and HT+ showed significantly lower translucency for high-speed sintering protocols (P≤.001), but the biaxial flexural strength remained the same after the high-speed sintering protocol at 1590 °C. Grain sizes increased with increasing final sintering temperature for ZI and HT+, whereas translucency generally decreased with increasing material thickness. No monoclinic phase was detected in any group. CONCLUSIONS: The flexural strength was maintained with high-speed sintering but led to a decrease in translucency for ZD and HT+.
TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.
Jansen, Jan Ulrich