Logins, Arturs (2015). On having evidence : a reply to Neta. Logos & Episteme, 6(3):367-370.
According to one line of thought only propositions can be part of one’s evidence, since only propositions can serve the central functions of our ordinary concept of evidence. Ram Neta has challenged this argument. In this paper I respond to Neta’s challenge.
According to one line of thought only propositions can be part of one’s evidence, since only propositions can serve the central functions of our ordinary concept of evidence. Ram Neta has challenged this argument. In this paper I respond to Neta’s challenge.
| Item Type: | Journal Article, refereed, original work |
|---|---|
| Communities & Collections: | 06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Philosophy |
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 100 Philosophy |
| Language: | English |
| Date: | September 2015 |
| Deposited On: | 28 Jul 2020 06:04 |
| Last Modified: | 28 Jul 2020 07:59 |
| Publisher: | Institutul European |
| ISSN: | 2069-0533 |
| OA Status: | Gold |
| Free access at: | Official URL. An embargo period may apply. |
| Official URL: | http://logos-and-episteme.acadiasi.ro/on-having-evidence-a-reply-to-neta-pages-367-370/ |
| Related URLs: | http://logos-and-episteme.acadiasi.ro/volume-vi-issue-3-september-2015/ |
Logins, Arturs