PURPOSE: To evaluate molecular and immunohistochemical markers to develop a molecular grading of urothelial bladder cancer and to test these markers in voided urine samples.Experimental Design: 255 consecutive biopsies from primary bladder cancer patients were evaluated on a tissue microarray. The clinical parameters gender, age, adjacent carcinoma in situ, and multifocality were collected. UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was done. Expression of cytokeratin 20, MIB1, and TP53 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) status was studied by SNaPshot mutation detection. Results were correlated with clinical outcome by Cox regression analysis. To assess the predictive power of different predictor subsets to detect high grade and tumor invasion, logistic regression models were learned. Additionally, voided urine samples of 119 patients were investigated. After cytologic examination, urine samples were matched with their biopsies and analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH), FGFR3 mutation, polysomy, and p16 deletion using UroVysion FISH. Receiver operator characteristic curves for various predictor subsets were plotted.RESULTS: In biopsies, high grade and solid growth pattern were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. A model consisting of UroVysion FISH and FGFR3 status (FISH + FGFR3) predicted high grade significantly better compared with a recently proposed molecular grade (MIB1 + FGFR3). In voided urine, the combination of cytology with LOH analysis (CYTO + LOH) reached the highest diagnostic accuracy for the detection of bladder cancer cells and performed better than cytology alone (sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 97.1%).CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cytology with LOH analysis could reduce unpleasant cystoscopies for bladder cancer patients. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(6):OF1-9).
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate molecular and immunohistochemical markers to develop a molecular grading of urothelial bladder cancer and to test these markers in voided urine samples.Experimental Design: 255 consecutive biopsies from primary bladder cancer patients were evaluated on a tissue microarray. The clinical parameters gender, age, adjacent carcinoma in situ, and multifocality were collected. UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was done. Expression of cytokeratin 20, MIB1, and TP53 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) status was studied by SNaPshot mutation detection. Results were correlated with clinical outcome by Cox regression analysis. To assess the predictive power of different predictor subsets to detect high grade and tumor invasion, logistic regression models were learned. Additionally, voided urine samples of 119 patients were investigated. After cytologic examination, urine samples were matched with their biopsies and analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH), FGFR3 mutation, polysomy, and p16 deletion using UroVysion FISH. Receiver operator characteristic curves for various predictor subsets were plotted.RESULTS: In biopsies, high grade and solid growth pattern were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. A model consisting of UroVysion FISH and FGFR3 status (FISH + FGFR3) predicted high grade significantly better compared with a recently proposed molecular grade (MIB1 + FGFR3). In voided urine, the combination of cytology with LOH analysis (CYTO + LOH) reached the highest diagnostic accuracy for the detection of bladder cancer cells and performed better than cytology alone (sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 97.1%).CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cytology with LOH analysis could reduce unpleasant cystoscopies for bladder cancer patients. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(6):OF1-9).
TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.
Wild, P J