Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Microsurgical phalloplasty in nontranssexual patients - Considerations after a retrospective single-center analysis of 23 cases


Spennato, Stefano; Burger, Anna E; Schlosshauer, Torsten; Küenzlen, Lara; Rothenberger, Jens; Kühn, Shafreena; Kiehlmann, Marcus; Radacki, Isabel; Sohn, Michael; Rieger, Ulrich M (2020). Microsurgical phalloplasty in nontranssexual patients - Considerations after a retrospective single-center analysis of 23 cases. Urology, 141:154-161.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of a single-center series of penile reconstruction using the radial free forearm flap in rare indications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 1993 until September 2016, 23 nontranssexual patients underwent phallic reconstruction by the use of a neuromicrovascular free radial forearm flap in our clinic. Patient-specific characteristics, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated and interpreted.
RESULTS: The indications for surgery were: disorders of sex development (34.8%), reconstruction after oncologic surgery (34.8%), automutilation (8.7%), iatrogenic (8.7%), microphallus (8.7%), and 1 case of priapism (4.3%). Two patients (8.7%) had a total flap necrosis and 2 patients (8.7%) had a partial flap necrosis; 3 out of these 4 patients were heavy smokers. Urinary fistulae and strictures were frequent but were successfully managed by urologists in all cases. There was no statistically significant correlation between smoking, comorbidities, number of venous anastomoses, and complications.
CONCLUSION: In departments experienced in microsurgery, the goals of penile reconstruction could also be achieved in patients with rare indications by the use of the neuromicrovascular free radial forearm flap. Despite the high rate of postoperative complications, penile reconstruction with the free radial forearm flap yields satisfying results. An intensive cooperation between the plastic-reconstructive team and the urological team is a prerequisite to achieve the best surgical result.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of a single-center series of penile reconstruction using the radial free forearm flap in rare indications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 1993 until September 2016, 23 nontranssexual patients underwent phallic reconstruction by the use of a neuromicrovascular free radial forearm flap in our clinic. Patient-specific characteristics, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated and interpreted.
RESULTS: The indications for surgery were: disorders of sex development (34.8%), reconstruction after oncologic surgery (34.8%), automutilation (8.7%), iatrogenic (8.7%), microphallus (8.7%), and 1 case of priapism (4.3%). Two patients (8.7%) had a total flap necrosis and 2 patients (8.7%) had a partial flap necrosis; 3 out of these 4 patients were heavy smokers. Urinary fistulae and strictures were frequent but were successfully managed by urologists in all cases. There was no statistically significant correlation between smoking, comorbidities, number of venous anastomoses, and complications.
CONCLUSION: In departments experienced in microsurgery, the goals of penile reconstruction could also be achieved in patients with rare indications by the use of the neuromicrovascular free radial forearm flap. Despite the high rate of postoperative complications, penile reconstruction with the free radial forearm flap yields satisfying results. An intensive cooperation between the plastic-reconstructive team and the urological team is a prerequisite to achieve the best surgical result.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Reconstructive Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Urology
Language:English
Date:2 July 2020
Deposited On:10 Sep 2020 16:47
Last Modified:11 Sep 2020 20:01
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0090-4295
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.038
PubMed ID:32283166

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

Get full-text in a library