Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Highway to (Digital) Surveillance: When Are Clients Coerced to Share Their Data with Insurers?


Loi, Michele; Hauser, Christian; Christen, Markus (2020). Highway to (Digital) Surveillance: When Are Clients Coerced to Share Their Data with Insurers? Journal of Business Ethics:1.

Abstract

Clients may feel trapped into sharing their private digital data with insurance companies to get a desired insurance product or premium. However, private insurance must collect some data to offer products and premiums appropriate to the client’s level of risk. This situation creates tension between the value of privacy and common insurance business practice. We argue for three main claims: first, coercion to share private data with insurers is <jats:italic>pro tanto</jats:italic> wrong because it violates the autonomous choice of a privacy-valuing client. Second, we maintain that irrespective of being coerced, the choice of accepting digital surveillance by insurers makes it harder for the client to protect his or her autonomy (and to act spontaneously and authentically). The violation of autonomy also makes coercing customers into digital surveillance <jats:italic>pro tanto</jats:italic> morally wrong. Third, having identified an economically plausible process involving no direct coercion by insurers, leading to the adoption of digital surveillance, we argue that such an outcome generates further threats against autonomy. This threat provides individuals with a <jats:italic>pro tanto</jats:italic> reason to prevent this process. We highlight the freedom dilemma faced by regulators who aim to prevent this outcome by constraining market freedoms and argue for the need for further moral and empirical research on this question.

Abstract

Clients may feel trapped into sharing their private digital data with insurance companies to get a desired insurance product or premium. However, private insurance must collect some data to offer products and premiums appropriate to the client’s level of risk. This situation creates tension between the value of privacy and common insurance business practice. We argue for three main claims: first, coercion to share private data with insurers is <jats:italic>pro tanto</jats:italic> wrong because it violates the autonomous choice of a privacy-valuing client. Second, we maintain that irrespective of being coerced, the choice of accepting digital surveillance by insurers makes it harder for the client to protect his or her autonomy (and to act spontaneously and authentically). The violation of autonomy also makes coercing customers into digital surveillance <jats:italic>pro tanto</jats:italic> morally wrong. Third, having identified an economically plausible process involving no direct coercion by insurers, leading to the adoption of digital surveillance, we argue that such an outcome generates further threats against autonomy. This threat provides individuals with a <jats:italic>pro tanto</jats:italic> reason to prevent this process. We highlight the freedom dilemma faced by regulators who aim to prevent this outcome by constraining market freedoms and argue for the need for further moral and empirical research on this question.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics

Altmetrics

Downloads

10 downloads since deposited on 23 Dec 2020
10 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine
08 Research Priority Programs > Digital Society Initiative
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > Business and International Management
Social Sciences & Humanities > General Business, Management and Accounting
Social Sciences & Humanities > Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Social Sciences & Humanities > Economics and Econometrics
Social Sciences & Humanities > Law
Uncontrolled Keywords:Economics and Econometrics, General Business, Management and Accounting, Business and International Management, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Law
Language:English
Date:8 November 2020
Deposited On:23 Dec 2020 14:26
Last Modified:03 May 2021 15:30
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0167-4544
OA Status:Hybrid
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04668-1
Project Information:
  • : FunderSNSF
  • : Grant ID407540_167218
  • : Project TitleBetween Solidarity and Personalization - Dealing with Ethical and Legal Big Data Challenges in the Insurance Industry

Download

Hybrid Open Access

Download PDF  'Highway to (Digital) Surveillance: When Are Clients Coerced to Share Their Data with Insurers?'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 627kB
View at publisher
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)