Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Sleeve Gastrectomy or Gastric Bypass: a “Post-Code” Lottery? A Comprehensive National Analysis of the Utilization of Bariatric Surgery in Switzerland Between 2011–2017

Gero, Daniel; Schneider, Marcel A; Suter, Michel; Peterli, Ralph; Vonlanthen, René; Turina, Matthias; Bueter, Marco (2021). Sleeve Gastrectomy or Gastric Bypass: a “Post-Code” Lottery? A Comprehensive National Analysis of the Utilization of Bariatric Surgery in Switzerland Between 2011–2017. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 17(3):563-574.

Abstract

Background: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) recently became the most frequently performed bariatric surgery (BS) worldwide, overtaking the long-time standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Main indications for one or the other procedure show large inter-center variations and warrant further investigations.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the influencers of primary BS selection in Switzerland.

Setting: Switzerland.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of all hospitalizations in Switzerland January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2017 with anonymized data provided by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office. BS procedures were identified based on ICD-10 and national surgical codes. Statistical analyses were performed with R.

Results: During the study period 27,375 BS were performed. The annual BS caseload doubled over time, whereas inpatient complications decreased (∼-33%). RYGB was the prevailing procedure, although its annual proportion decreased from 80% to 70% over 7 years. Meanwhile, use of SG increased from 14% to 23%. Primary RYGB and SG had similar rates of inpatient mortality (∼.05%) and morbidity (8.0 versus 7.4%, P =.148), with the exception of higher ileus rates following RYGB (.7 versus .1%, P < .001). Patient-related factors favoring the indication of SG were male sex, extremes of age, and metabolic co-morbidities , while gastroesophageal reflux disease and private insurance-favored RYGB. Strikingly, differences between geographic regions outweighed patient-related factors in procedure selection: inhabitants of German- and Italian-speaking areas had higher likelihood (OR 4.6; 3.9, P < .001) to receive SG than those in French-speaking areas.

Conclusion: Geographic differences in primary BS procedure selection indicate a lack of objective rationales. Long-term risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to assist evidence-based decision making.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Intensive Care Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Visceral and Transplantation Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Health Sciences > Surgery
Uncontrolled Keywords:Surgery
Language:English
Date:1 March 2021
Deposited On:22 Jan 2021 08:26
Last Modified:24 Jan 2025 02:41
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1550-7289
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.10.023
PubMed ID:33281057

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
10 citations in Web of Science®
10 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

0 downloads since deposited on 22 Jan 2021
0 downloads since 12 months

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications