Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Accuracy of Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated Using Conventional and Digital Technologies


Muehlemann, Elena; Özcan, Mutlu (2022). Accuracy of Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated Using Conventional and Digital Technologies. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 30(2):76-86.

Abstract

This study analyzed the fit accuracy of the removable partial denture (RPD) metal frameworks produced using digital and conventional manufacturing technologies. Mandibular RPD metal frameworks (N=15, n=3 per group) were fabricated on a representative clinical case. RPDs were fabricated using one of the following manufacturing procedures: a) conventional lost-wax casting technique (C-LW), b) conventional casting of milled sacrificial patterns (C-M), c) conventional casting of printed sacrificial patterns (C-P), d) selective laser melting (SLM), e) direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technologies. The fit accuracy of RPD frameworks was analyzed by fabricating replicas with silicone registration material and measuring with a digital microscope. A total of 11 sites and 29 areas in the RPD metal frameworks were considered for the accuracy measurements (μm). Data were statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank and Friedman test (α=0.05). Before finishing and polishing, C-M method presented overall significantly better (P⟨.001) fit accuracy (118 μm) than those of other methods (195-265 μm). After finishing and polishing, C-M method showed overall significantly better (P⟨.033) fit accuracy (205.7 μm) than C-LW and SLM methods (285.7 μm; 249 μm) and comparable fit accuracy to that of C-P and DMLS methods. Accuracy at the minor and major connector areas of RPDs were affected from the manufacturing technologies. Clinical Implications: When accuracy of RPDs are considered, digital technologies tested presented similar results to those of conventional manufacturing method except for minor and major connector areas which necessitates further improvement.

Abstract

This study analyzed the fit accuracy of the removable partial denture (RPD) metal frameworks produced using digital and conventional manufacturing technologies. Mandibular RPD metal frameworks (N=15, n=3 per group) were fabricated on a representative clinical case. RPDs were fabricated using one of the following manufacturing procedures: a) conventional lost-wax casting technique (C-LW), b) conventional casting of milled sacrificial patterns (C-M), c) conventional casting of printed sacrificial patterns (C-P), d) selective laser melting (SLM), e) direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technologies. The fit accuracy of RPD frameworks was analyzed by fabricating replicas with silicone registration material and measuring with a digital microscope. A total of 11 sites and 29 areas in the RPD metal frameworks were considered for the accuracy measurements (μm). Data were statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank and Friedman test (α=0.05). Before finishing and polishing, C-M method presented overall significantly better (P⟨.001) fit accuracy (118 μm) than those of other methods (195-265 μm). After finishing and polishing, C-M method showed overall significantly better (P⟨.033) fit accuracy (205.7 μm) than C-LW and SLM methods (285.7 μm; 249 μm) and comparable fit accuracy to that of C-P and DMLS methods. Accuracy at the minor and major connector areas of RPDs were affected from the manufacturing technologies. Clinical Implications: When accuracy of RPDs are considered, digital technologies tested presented similar results to those of conventional manufacturing method except for minor and major connector areas which necessitates further improvement.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
3 citations in Web of Science®
6 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

3 downloads since deposited on 01 Dec 2021
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:29 May 2022
Deposited On:01 Dec 2021 14:40
Last Modified:25 Feb 2024 02:50
Publisher:Mosby-Year Book Europe
ISSN:0965-7452
OA Status:Closed
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2285Muehlemann11
PubMed ID:34223713