Navigation auf zora.uzh.ch

Search ZORA

ZORA (Zurich Open Repository and Archive)

Migration von ZORA auf die Software DSpace

ZORA will change to a new software on 8th September 2025. Please note: deadline for new submissions is 21th July 2025!

Information & dates for training courses can be found here: Information on Software Migration.

Early Genital Surgery in Disorders/Differences of Sex Development: Patients’ Perspectives

Bennecke, Elena; Bernstein, Stephanie; Lee, Peter; van de Grift, Tim C; Nordenskjöld, Agneta; Rapp, Marion; Simmonds, Margaret; Streuli, Jürg Caspar; Thyen, Ute; Wiesemann, Claudia (2021). Early Genital Surgery in Disorders/Differences of Sex Development: Patients’ Perspectives. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(3):913-923.

Abstract

Controversy continues over a proposed moratorium on elective genital surgery in childhood for disorders/differences of sex development (DSD). Empirical evidence on patient preference is needed to inform decision-making. We conducted a multicentre survey by cross-sectional questionnaire in 14 specialized clinics in six European countries. The sample comprised 459 individuals (≥ 16 years) with a DSD diagnosis, including individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) (n = 192), XY DSD with prenatal androgen effect (A) (n = 150), and without (nA) (n = 117). Main outcome measures were level of agreement with given statements regarding genital surgery, including clitoris reduction, vaginoplasty, and hypospadias repair. A total of 66% of individuals with CAH and 60% of those with XY DSD-A thought that infancy or childhood were the appropriate age for genital surgery. Females with XY DSD were divided on this issue and tended to prefer vaginoplasty at a later age (XY DSD-A 39%, XY DSD-nA 32%). A total of 47% of males preferred early hypospadias surgery. Only 12% (CAH), 11% (XY DSD-A), and 21% (XY DSD-nA) thought they would have been better off without any surgery in childhood or adolescence. Individuals who had early genital surgery were more likely to approve of it. Outcome data failed to support a general moratorium on early elective genital surgery. Participant perspectives varied considerably by diagnostic category, gender, history of surgery, and contact with support groups. Case-by-case decision-making is better suited to grasping the ethical complexity of the issues at stake.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00006072.

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Scopus Subject Areas:Social Sciences & Humanities > Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Social Sciences & Humanities > General Psychology
Uncontrolled Keywords:General Psychology, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Language:English
Date:1 April 2021
Deposited On:15 Feb 2022 11:18
Last Modified:14 Jun 2025 03:38
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0004-0002
OA Status:Hybrid
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01953-6
Project Information:
  • Funder: FP7
  • Grant ID: 305373
  • Project Title: DSD-LIFE - Clinical European study on the outcome of surgical and hormonal therapy and psychological intervention in disorders of sex development (DSD)
  • Funder: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
  • Grant ID:
  • Project Title:
Download PDF  'Early Genital Surgery in Disorders/Differences of Sex Development: Patients’ Perspectives'.
Preview
  • Content: Published Version
  • Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Metadata Export

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
33 citations in Web of Science®
41 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

50 downloads since deposited on 15 Feb 2022
14 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Authors, Affiliations, Collaborations

Similar Publications